Skip to main content
J.J. McCarthy headshot
Position: QuarterbackP Tier

J.J. McCarthy

QB · MIN · Bye 6

Age 236'3"219 lbs2 yr
FFT9956

Elite Profile

Calibrated public rating

RAW 61 · 91% cov

Projection

12.8

Half-PPR / game

Market ADP

260.0

Consensus overall

FFT fair value

239.0

Calibrated pick

Draft delta

+21.0

Market minus FFT

Draft recommendation

Target ahead of market

Risk / reliability

Medium Risk

62
Risk: Medium

Reliability

62 / 99

Coverage

80%

Live board

Today's Read

NO MARKET DATA

Measured, and nothing about him departs from what the market is already pricing.

Model rank

Market

Confidence

low

Full analysis

2026 week 2

Weekly Outlook

FFT · BDL · SLEEPER · MARKETS

Our projection

12.9

Weighted weekly consensus

BDL projection

BALLDONTLIE weekly

Sleeper projection

Sleeper weekly

Game status

Inactive

No injury description reported

Game market

Total · Spread

Implied team total · cross-book median

Live draft market

ADP 169.5 · Rostered 0.6%

BDL change -0.0%

BALLDONTLIE data checked 9/20/2026, 5:44:49 PM ET. Sportsbook values are consensus context, not betting advice.

Measured 2026 · Regular season

Season Production

Loading 2026 results…

Actual BALLDONTLIE box scores · FFT-computed fantasy points · Preseason excluded. Missing stats are not zeroes.

2026 / Player Game Center

Every play has a story.

J.J. McCarthy · Recorded performance, game context, fantasy takeaways.

Loading game data…

Measured game log

Weekly Performance

Actual BALLDONTLIE box scores · FFT-computed fantasy points. Missing weeks are never filled with zeroes.

No 2026 regular-season stat line recorded for J.J. McCarthy yet.

This view will populate automatically when measured games enter the data spine.

FFT Newsroom

Latest news for J.J. McCarthy

All reports

Position-relative

FFT99 Pillar Scores

Methodology

Fantasy Scoring Dominance

64

Average

64

Top 26% at QB

Rushing Leverage

69

Average

69

Top 19% at QB

Replacement + Draft Economics

72

Strong

72

Top 28% at QB

Passing Engine

43

Watch

43

Top 43% at QB

Offensive Ecosystem

45

Watch

45

Top 55% at QB

Fantasy Playoff Schedule

89

Elite

89

Top 2% at QB

Player Profile

Fantasy Scoring Dominance64
Rushing Leverage69
Replacement + Draft Economics72
Passing Engine43
Offensive Ecosystem45
Fantasy Playoff Schedule89

Games

10

Half-PPR

125.38

Total TD

15

Model Component Contributions

The measured inputs doing the most work inside this grade.

Proj Ppg
14%
Value Over Replacement
13%
Prior Ppg
9%
Boom Rate
7%
Rush Ypg
6%
Floor Rate
5%
Designed Attempts
5%
Scramble Rate
3%

Draft Economics

Value Over Replacement

-51.0

proj. half-PPR pts

Rank Delta

+7

position spots vs ADP

Value Grade

B+

Good Value

reachfair valuesteal

Market

260.0

FFT value

239.0

Board Δ

+21.0

Playoff Schedule

Week 15

vs DET

Rank 9th

Great

Week 16

vs WAS

Rank 3rd

Elite

Week 17

@ NYJ

Rank 2nd

Elite

FFT99 vs ADP

Every dot is a real position peer with a market price.

J.J. McCarthyCONSENSUS ADP →FFT99 →

Deep research dossier

Evidence, history and model transparency

The decision dashboard ends above. Open only the research sections you need below—the full evidence remains available without overwhelming the player overview.

The call record

Claims written down before the season, sealed at registration, and graded in public — misses kept.

No pre-registered call was made on J.J. McCarthy. The record holds 29 calls in total, selected from the board by signal strength and divergence — most players do not clear that bar, and silence here means we did not stake a claim on him, not that he graded badly.

2025 production

What he actually did last season. Measured, not projected.

Games

10

PPR pts

125.4

Half-PPR pts

125.4

PPR / game

12.5

Receiving

Targets

0

Receptions

0

Rec yards

0

Rec TDs

0

Target share

0.0%

Air yards share

0.0%

WOPR

0.00

Rushing

Carries

37

Rush yards

181

Rush TDs

4

Yards / carry

4.89

Passing

Pass yards

1632

Pass TDs

11

Interceptions

12

nflverse season totals for 2025, joined on normalised name and position (gsis 00-0039923). These are actuals — nothing here is modelled.

What the market says

Every ADP source we hold, side by side, and where our model sits against them.

Consensus ADP

260.0

Median

260.0

Sources ranking him

2/4

Agreement

Medium

SourceRank / ADP
Yahoo ADPunranked
Sleeper ADP270.0
RTSports ADP250.0
Fantasy Football Calculator ADP (live)unranked

The sources that ranked him disagree by 20.0 picks between highest and lowest (standard deviation 10.0).

Mean and median are computed across the sources that actually ranked him — an unranked source never enters the average, because a sentinel treated as a pick number would drag a real player hundreds of slots. Spread, deviation and agreement are null under two ranked sources rather than 0, since one source cannot agree with itself. The FFT model rank is our own output and is never folded in as if it were an outside source.

Week-to-week, 2025

Consistency and range — the part a season total hides.

Weeks with a line

10

PPR / game

12.5

Std dev

8.0

Coeff. of variation

0.64

Boom rate

0% (0/10)

Bust rate

60% (6/10)

Best week

23.5 wk 15

Worst week

0.5 wk 12

Recent form — last 4 games with a line

15.1 PPR per game over weeks 14, 15, 16, 18+2.5 against his season average.

Every week (10 lines)
WkOppPPRTgtRecYdsCarRuYdTDRZ
1CHI22.200022534
2ATL2.800052502
9DET18.900091236
10BAL14.700054817
11CHI6.00000013
12GB0.500021000
14WAS20.400061934
15DAL23.500041539
16NYG8.300022013
18GB8.00002703

The weekly LINES are measured: 2025 game logs, joined on gsis id 00-0039923. Everything derived from them above — per-game, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, boom and bust rates, recent form — is computed by us and carries the FFT model (beta) label. It is not an observed stat.

This whole block is on the PPR scale, including the thresholds — the artifact publishes boom and bust in PPR (QB: boom ≥ 25, bust ≤ 15) and converting only the points would leave the rates measured against a different ruler than the one they were defined on. The hero above is half-PPR because that is what the model ranks on. Two rulers, each labelled, rather than one silently mixed. Rates need at least 4 games to carry weight; recent form is the last 4.

Advanced usage & efficiency

Route concepts, red-zone opportunity, and separation-adjusted catch rate.

Red-zone opportunity

Scoring upside

RZ targets

0

RZ carries

50

RZ TDs

14

aDOT

Concept EPA / target

Classified targets

Catch residual

YAC over expected

Every field is derived by FFT from openly-licensed nflverse play-by-play, or taken from the free public NFL Next Gen Stats endpoint. No licensed trial data (Sportradar, BALLDONTLIE) is included, which is why this file can be committed and shipped with the build. Red zone: Plays snapped inside the opponent 20-yard line. Red-zone usage measures opportunity; this repo’s own backtest shows it adds little on top of plain volume, so it is retained as context and is deliberately not described as an edge.

How the model gets there

The component projection behind the headline number, and what it was built from.

Projected games

16.3

Half-PPR (season)

208.3

PPR (season)

208.3

Confidence

medium

Proj targets

0.2

Proj receptions

0.1

Proj rec yards

0

Proj rec TDs

0.0

Proj carries

57.8

Proj rush yards

264

Proj rush TDs

4.3

Proj pass yards

2743

Proj pass TDs

18.5

Proj INTs

12.3

Touchdown regression

He actually scored 15 touchdowns last season. Against his measured opportunity the model expects a change of 7.8. The gap between what a player scored and what his opportunity implies is one of the four signals the edge engine reads.

What this projection was built from

10 g in 2025, 24.3 att/g, 92% snaps (regressed to the role, not the position), QB2 on depth chart, age 24, +7.8 TD vs 2025 on red-zone opportunity

fft-projection-2.3.0-beta. The model reads measured production, opportunity and age, and reads no ADP field at any stage — so it can disagree with the market, which is the only reason a disagreement is worth anything. Draft capital was not resolved for this player, which the model treats as unknown rather than as undrafted.

What this page is standing on

Which sources answered for this player, and which did not.

  • Identity join: Resolved to gsis 00-0039923 via the 2025 nflverse season file. The weekly log and advanced splits are keyed on that id.
  • Market ADP: A bundled snapshot of platform ADP, not a live feed. Shown for comparison and never read by the projection model.
  • Headshot: Resolved from exact-name.
  • Vitals: Height, weight, college and jersey are read from nflverse and keyed on gsis id 00-0039923 — not on name. Name keying matches players to relatives who share one: "Marvin Harrison Jr." also matches his father's 1996 row, and whichever came first in the file would win.
  • Not shown: draft round and pick. The bundled player file carries them on roughly 48% of rows and populates them late, so a blank is equally consistent with a genuine undrafted free agent and with a first-rounder nobody has ingested yet. The model’s own three-state read is used instead, above.

Model run caveats

  • No usable red-zone RECEIVING fit for QB — receiving touchdowns at that position come from the shrunk per-target rate alone.
  • Rookie draft capital on this run: 82 drafted (projected from round/pick), 141 confirmed undrafted, 177 with capital UNKNOWN.
  • 177 of 400 rookie projections (44%) have NO KNOWN DRAFT CAPITAL because this draft class has not been ingested by any source the model can read. For those players the draft-capital path did not run: a first-round pick and a camp arm receive the same number, separated only by depth-chart order. Those projections are flagged `isPositionalFloor` and must be read as a floor for the role, not as a valuation of the player.

How the model works

Inputs, method, and the forbidden-inputs list. It reads no ADP at any stage.

Where it loses

Pre-registered calls, graded in public, misses kept on the page.

Model Rankings

Every player, with the model's BUY / FADE call against consensus ADP built into the board.