Live board
Today's Read
Scored 10 TDs on 29 red-zone opportunities — opportunity implies about 12.49. Finishing that far below expectation tends to regress upward, and the market is still pricing the 10.
Model rank
Market
—
Confidence
low
QB · ATL · Bye 11
Elite Profile
Calibrated public rating
Projection
14.0
Half-PPR / game
Market ADP
239.5
Consensus overall
FFT fair value
186.3
Calibrated pick
Draft delta
+53.2
Market minus FFT
Draft recommendation
Target ahead of market
Risk / reliability
Medium Risk
Reliability
59 / 99
Coverage
80%
Live board
Scored 10 TDs on 29 red-zone opportunities — opportunity implies about 12.49. Finishing that far below expectation tends to regress upward, and the market is still pricing the 10.
Model rank
Market
—
Confidence
low
2026 week 1
The BALLDONTLIE weekly outlook is unavailable for this player right now. The rest of the profile remains live.
Measured 2026 · Regular season
Loading 2026 results…
Actual BALLDONTLIE box scores · FFT-computed fantasy points · Preseason excluded. Missing stats are not zeroes.
2026 / Player Game Center
Michael Penix Jr. · Recorded performance, game context, fantasy takeaways.
Loading game data…
Measured game log
Actual BALLDONTLIE box scores · FFT-computed fantasy points. Missing weeks are never filled with zeroes.
No 2026 regular-season stat line recorded for Michael Penix Jr. yet.
This view will populate automatically when measured games enter the data spine.
FFT Newsroom
Position-relative
Fantasy Scoring Dominance
68
Average
Top 25% at QB
Rushing Leverage
58
Average
Top 28% at QB
Replacement + Draft Economics
80
Strong
Top 20% at QB
Passing Engine
69
Average
Top 15% at QB
Offensive Ecosystem
56
Average
Top 40% at QB
Fantasy Playoff Schedule
64
Average
Top 21% at QB
Games
9
Half-PPR
120.28
Total TD
10
The measured inputs doing the most work inside this grade.
Value Over Replacement
-31.0
proj. half-PPR pts
Rank Delta
+12
position spots vs ADP
Value Grade
A
Great Value
Market
239.5
FFT value
186.3
Board Δ
+53.2
Week 15
@ WAS
Rank 3rd
EliteWeek 16
vs TB
Rank 4th
EliteWeek 17
vs NO
Rank 25th
ToughEvery dot is a real position peer with a market price.
Deep research dossier
The decision dashboard ends above. Open only the research sections you need below—the full evidence remains available without overwhelming the player overview.
Claims written down before the season, sealed at registration, and graded in public — misses kept.
No pre-registered call was made on Michael Penix Jr.. The record holds 29 calls in total, selected from the board by signal strength and divergence — most players do not clear that bar, and silence here means we did not stake a claim on him, not that he graded badly.
What he actually did last season. Measured, not projected.
Games
9
PPR pts
120.3
Half-PPR pts
120.3
PPR / game
13.4
Receiving
Targets
0
Receptions
0
Rec yards
0
Rec TDs
0
Target share
0.0%
Air yards share
0.0%
WOPR
0.00
Rushing
Carries
21
Rush yards
70
Rush TDs
1
Yards / carry
3.33
Passing
Pass yards
1982
Pass TDs
9
Interceptions
3
nflverse season totals for 2025, joined on normalised name and position (gsis 00-0039917). These are actuals — nothing here is modelled.
Every ADP source we hold, side by side, and where our model sits against them.
Consensus ADP
239.5
Median
239.5
Sources ranking him
2/3
Agreement
Low
| Source | Rank / ADP |
|---|---|
| Yahoo ADP | unranked |
| Sleeper ADP | 276.0 |
| RTSports ADP | 203.0 |
The sources that ranked him disagree by 73.0 picks between highest and lowest (standard deviation 36.5).
Mean and median are computed across the sources that actually ranked him — an unranked source never enters the average, because a sentinel treated as a pick number would drag a real player hundreds of slots. Spread, deviation and agreement are null under two ranked sources rather than 0, since one source cannot agree with itself. The FFT model rank is our own output and is never folded in as if it were an outside source.
Consistency and range — the part a season total hides.
Weeks with a line
9
PPR / game
13.4
Std dev
6.9
Coeff. of variation
0.51
Boom rate
0% (0/9)
Bust rate
67% (6/9)
Best week
24.0 wk 1
Worst week
3.8 wk 3
Recent form — last 4 games with a line
13.5 PPR per game over weeks 7, 9, 10, 11 — +0.1 against his season average.
| Wk | Opp | PPR | Tgt | Rec | Yds | Car | RuYd | TD | RZ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TB | 24.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 4 |
| 2 | MIN | 5.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 7 |
| 3 | CAR | 3.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | WAS | 18.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| 6 | BUF | 14.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 5 |
| 7 | SF | 12.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 1 |
| 9 | NE | 22.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 3 | 10 |
| 10 | IND | 11.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 |
| 11 | CAR | 7.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 1 |
The weekly LINES are measured: 2025 game logs, joined on gsis id 00-0039917. Everything derived from them above — per-game, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, boom and bust rates, recent form — is computed by us and carries the FFT model (beta) label. It is not an observed stat.
This whole block is on the PPR scale, including the thresholds — the artifact publishes boom and bust in PPR (QB: boom ≥ 25, bust ≤ 15) and converting only the points would leave the rates measured against a different ruler than the one they were defined on. The hero above is half-PPR because that is what the model ranks on. Two rulers, each labelled, rather than one silently mixed. Rates need at least 4 games to carry weight; recent form is the last 4.
Route concepts, red-zone opportunity, and separation-adjusted catch rate.
RZ targets
0
RZ carries
36
RZ TDs
9
aDOT
—
Concept EPA / target
—
Classified targets
—
Catch residual
—
YAC over expected
—
Every field is derived by FFT from openly-licensed nflverse play-by-play, or taken from the free public NFL Next Gen Stats endpoint. No licensed trial data (Sportradar, BALLDONTLIE) is included, which is why this file can be committed and shipped with the build. Red zone: Plays snapped inside the opponent 20-yard line. Red-zone usage measures opportunity; this repo’s own backtest shows it adds little on top of plain volume, so it is retained as context and is deliberately not described as an edge.
The component projection behind the headline number, and what it was built from.
Projected games
16.2
Half-PPR (season)
227.1
PPR (season)
227.2
Confidence
medium
Proj targets
0.2
Proj receptions
0.1
Proj rec yards
0
Proj rec TDs
0.0
Proj carries
39.0
Proj rush yards
172
Proj rush TDs
2.8
Proj pass yards
3370
Proj pass TDs
19.7
Proj INTs
8.4
Touchdown regression
He actually scored 10 touchdowns last season. Against his measured opportunity the model expects a change of 12.5. The gap between what a player scored and what his opportunity implies is one of the four signals the edge engine reads.
What this projection was built from
9 g in 2025, 30.7 att/g, 93% snaps (regressed to the role, not the position), QB1 on depth chart, age 26, +12.5 TD vs 2025 on red-zone opportunity
fft-projection-2.3.0-beta. The model reads measured production, opportunity and age, and reads no ADP field at any stage — so it can disagree with the market, which is the only reason a disagreement is worth anything. Draft capital was not resolved for this player, which the model treats as unknown rather than as undrafted.
Which sources answered for this player, and which did not.
Model run caveats
How the model works
Inputs, method, and the forbidden-inputs list. It reads no ADP at any stage.
Where it loses
Pre-registered calls, graded in public, misses kept on the page.
Model Rankings
Every player, with the model's BUY / FADE call against consensus ADP built into the board.