Skip to main content
Hunter Henry headshot
Position: Tight endH Tier

Hunter Henry

TE · NE · Bye 11

Age 316'5"249 lbs10 yr
FFT9973

Elite Profile

Calibrated public rating

RAW 75 · 89% cov

Projection

7.6

Half-PPR / game

Market ADP

142.0

Consensus overall

FFT fair value

120.6

Calibrated pick

Draft delta

+21.4

Market minus FFT

Draft recommendation

Target ahead of market

Risk / reliability

Low Risk

89
Risk: Low

Reliability

89 / 99

Coverage

80%

Live board

Today's Read

NO MARKET DATA

His route-concept mix is worth 0.43 EPA per target against a 0.05 league baseline. His most common concept is flat at 21% of targets. He is used in higher-value ways than his target count alone suggests.

Model rank

Market

Confidence

low

Full analysis

2026 week 2

Weekly Outlook

FFT · BDL · SLEEPER · MARKETS

Our projection

8.0

Weighted weekly consensus

BDL projection

7.6

BALLDONTLIE weekly

Sleeper projection

8.3

Sleeper weekly

Game status

Not reported

No injury description reported

Latest practice

Not reported

Game-day active

Active

Started

Yes

Participation

Played

Game market

Total · Spread

Implied team total · cross-book median

Live draft market

ADP 160.5 · Rostered 50.7%

BDL change +0.1%

BALLDONTLIE data checked 9/20/2026, 6:35:40 PM ET. Sportsbook values are consensus context, not betting advice.

Measured 2026 · Regular season

Season Production

Loading 2026 results…

Actual BALLDONTLIE box scores · FFT-computed fantasy points · Preseason excluded. Missing stats are not zeroes.

2026 / Player Game Center

Every play has a story.

Hunter Henry · Recorded performance, game context, fantasy takeaways.

Loading game data…

Measured game log

Weekly Performance

Actual BALLDONTLIE box scores · FFT-computed fantasy points. Missing weeks are never filled with zeroes.

No 2026 regular-season stat line recorded for Hunter Henry yet.

This view will populate automatically when measured games enter the data spine.

FFT Newsroom

Latest news for Hunter Henry

All reports

Position-relative

FFT99 Pillar Scores

Methodology

Target Command & Offensive Role

86

Elite

86

Top 4% at TE

Replacement + Draft Economics

93

Elite

93

Top 6% at TE

TD / High-Value Opportunity

71

Strong

71

Top 15% at TE

Receiving Talent

71

Strong

71

Top 19% at TE

Offensive Ecosystem

68

Average

68

Top 11% at TE

Fantasy Playoff Schedule

54

Watch

54

Top 42% at TE

Player Profile

Target Command & Offensive Role86
Replacement + Draft Economics93
TD / High-Value Opportunity71
Receiving Talent71
Offensive Ecosystem68
Fantasy Playoff Schedule54

Games

17

Half-PPR

118.8

Total TD

7

Model Component Contributions

The measured inputs doing the most work inside this grade.

Value Over Replacement
12%
Target Share
10%
Targets Per Game
8%
First-Read Share (proxy)
8%
Hierarchy
6%
Routes
6%
YPRR (Efficiency)
5%
RZ Target Share
4%

Draft Economics

Value Over Replacement

-0.6

proj. half-PPR pts

Rank Delta

+3

position spots vs ADP

Value Grade

B+

Good Value

reachfair valuesteal

Market

142.0

FFT value

120.6

Board Δ

+21.4

Playoff Schedule

Week 15

@ KC

Rank 25th

Tough

Week 16

@ NYJ

Rank 8th

Elite

Week 17

vs DEN

Rank 16th

Great

FFT99 vs ADP

Every dot is a real position peer with a market price.

Hunter HenryCONSENSUS ADP →FFT99 →

Deep research dossier

Evidence, history and model transparency

The decision dashboard ends above. Open only the research sections you need below—the full evidence remains available without overwhelming the player overview.

The call record

Claims written down before the season, sealed at registration, and graded in public — misses kept.

No pre-registered call was made on Hunter Henry. The record holds 29 calls in total, selected from the board by signal strength and divergence — most players do not clear that bar, and silence here means we did not stake a claim on him, not that he graded badly.

2025 production

What he actually did last season. Measured, not projected.

Games

17

PPR pts

178.8

Half-PPR pts

118.8

PPR / game

10.5

Receiving

Targets

87

Receptions

60

Rec yards

768

Rec TDs

7

Target share

18.0%

Air yards share

15.4%

WOPR

0.38

Rushing

Carries

0

Rush yards

0

Rush TDs

0

Yards / carry

Passing

Pass yards

0

Pass TDs

0

Interceptions

0

nflverse season totals for 2025, joined on normalised name and position (gsis 00-0033090). These are actuals — nothing here is modelled.

What the market says

Every ADP source we hold, side by side, and where our model sits against them.

Consensus ADP

142.0

Median

151.0

Sources ranking him

3/4

Agreement

Medium

SourceRank / ADP
Yahoo ADP155.0
Sleeper ADP120.0
RTSports ADP151.0
Fantasy Football Calculator ADP (live)unranked

The sources that ranked him disagree by 35.0 picks between highest and lowest (standard deviation 15.6).

Mean and median are computed across the sources that actually ranked him — an unranked source never enters the average, because a sentinel treated as a pick number would drag a real player hundreds of slots. Spread, deviation and agreement are null under two ranked sources rather than 0, since one source cannot agree with itself. The FFT model rank is our own output and is never folded in as if it were an outside source.

Week-to-week, 2025

Consistency and range — the part a season total hides.

Weeks with a line

17

PPR / game

10.5

Std dev

7.1

Coeff. of variation

0.67

Boom rate

18% (3/17)

Bust rate

18% (3/17)

Best week

29.0 wk 3

Worst week

1.9 wk 2

Recent form — last 4 games with a line

10.7 PPR per game over weeks 15, 16, 17, 18+0.2 against his season average.

Every week (17 lines)
WkOppPPRTgtRecYdsCarRuYdTDRZ
1LV10.684660000
2MIA1.93190001
3PIT29.0118900024
4CAR11.922390011
5BUF6.642460001
6NO5.733270000
7TEN7.354330000
8CLE7.71170011
9ATL9.164510000
10TB1.94190001
11NYJ8.564450001
12CIN24.51071150013
13NYG11.364730004
15BUF2.831180000
16BAL15.576350012
17NYJ13.933490012
18MIA10.655560001

The weekly LINES are measured: 2025 game logs, joined on gsis id 00-0033090. Everything derived from them above — per-game, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, boom and bust rates, recent form — is computed by us and carries the FFT model (beta) label. It is not an observed stat.

This whole block is on the PPR scale, including the thresholds — the artifact publishes boom and bust in PPR (TE: boom ≥ 15, bust ≤ 5) and converting only the points would leave the rates measured against a different ruler than the one they were defined on. The hero above is half-PPR because that is what the model ranks on. Two rulers, each labelled, rather than one silently mixed. Rates need at least 4 games to carry weight; recent form is the last 4.

Advanced usage & efficiency

Route concepts, red-zone opportunity, and separation-adjusted catch rate.

Red-zone opportunity

Scoring upside

RZ targets

24

RZ carries

RZ TDs

5

aDOT

8.1

Concept EPA / target

0.429

Classified targets

102

Catch residual

0.989

YAC over expected

0.49

Most-run concept: FLAT on 20.6% of his classified targets.

Every field is derived by FFT from openly-licensed nflverse play-by-play, or taken from the free public NFL Next Gen Stats endpoint. No licensed trial data (Sportradar, BALLDONTLIE) is included, which is why this file can be committed and shipped with the build. Red zone: Plays snapped inside the opponent 20-yard line. Red-zone usage measures opportunity; this repo’s own backtest shows it adds little on top of plain volume, so it is retained as context and is deliberately not described as an edge.

How the model gets there

The component projection behind the headline number, and what it was built from.

Projected games

13.6

Half-PPR (season)

103.7

PPR (season)

127.7

Confidence

high

Proj targets

68.5

Proj receptions

48.0

Proj rec yards

534

Proj rec TDs

4.4

Proj carries

0.6

Proj rush yards

2

Proj rush TDs

0.0

Proj pass yards

0

Proj pass TDs

0.0

Proj INTs

0.0

Touchdown regression

He actually scored 7 touchdowns last season. Against his measured opportunity the model expects a change of -2.6. The gap between what a player scored and what his opportunity implies is one of the four signals the edge engine reads.

What this projection was built from

17 g in 2025, 5.1 tgt/g, 79% snaps (regressed to the role, not the position), TE1 on depth chart, age 32, -2.6 TD vs 2025 on red-zone opportunity

fft-projection-2.3.0-beta. The model reads measured production, opportunity and age, and reads no ADP field at any stage — so it can disagree with the market, which is the only reason a disagreement is worth anything. Draft capital was not resolved for this player, which the model treats as unknown rather than as undrafted.

What this page is standing on

Which sources answered for this player, and which did not.

  • Identity join: Resolved to gsis 00-0033090 via the 2025 nflverse season file. The weekly log and advanced splits are keyed on that id.
  • Market ADP: A bundled snapshot of platform ADP, not a live feed. Shown for comparison and never read by the projection model.
  • Headshot: Resolved from exact-name.
  • Vitals: Height, weight, college and jersey are read from nflverse and keyed on gsis id 00-0033090 — not on name. Name keying matches players to relatives who share one: "Marvin Harrison Jr." also matches his father's 1996 row, and whichever came first in the file would win.
  • Not shown: draft round and pick. The bundled player file carries them on roughly 48% of rows and populates them late, so a blank is equally consistent with a genuine undrafted free agent and with a first-rounder nobody has ingested yet. The model’s own three-state read is used instead, above.

Model run caveats

  • No usable red-zone RECEIVING fit for QB — receiving touchdowns at that position come from the shrunk per-target rate alone.
  • Rookie draft capital on this run: 82 drafted (projected from round/pick), 141 confirmed undrafted, 177 with capital UNKNOWN.
  • 177 of 400 rookie projections (44%) have NO KNOWN DRAFT CAPITAL because this draft class has not been ingested by any source the model can read. For those players the draft-capital path did not run: a first-round pick and a camp arm receive the same number, separated only by depth-chart order. Those projections are flagged `isPositionalFloor` and must be read as a floor for the role, not as a valuation of the player.

How the model works

Inputs, method, and the forbidden-inputs list. It reads no ADP at any stage.

Where it loses

Pre-registered calls, graded in public, misses kept on the page.

Model Rankings

Every player, with the model's BUY / FADE call against consensus ADP built into the board.