Skip to main content
Chig Okonkwo headshot
Position: Tight endK Tier

Chig Okonkwo

TE · WAS · Bye 7

Age 276'3"238 lbs4 yr
FFT9966

Elite Profile

Calibrated public rating

RAW 58 · 75% cov

Projection

4.4

Half-PPR / game

Market ADP

149.7

Consensus overall

FFT fair value

172.8

Calibrated pick

Draft delta

-23.2

Market minus FFT

Draft recommendation

Market is aggressive

Risk / reliability

Medium Risk

57
Risk: Medium

Reliability

57 / 99

Coverage

80%

Live board

Today's Read

NO MARKET DATA

catches 3.1 points less often than his 4.47-yard target depth predicts, and +1.13 yards after catch versus expectation. That is earned production rather than volume, and it tends to persist.

Model rank

Market

Confidence

low

Full analysis

2026 week 2

Weekly Outlook

FFT · BDL · SLEEPER · MARKETS

Our projection

0.0

Weighted weekly consensus

BDL projection

BALLDONTLIE weekly

Sleeper projection

Sleeper weekly

Game status

Inactive

No injury description reported

Game market

Total · Spread

Implied team total · cross-book median

Live draft market

ADP 169.6 · Rostered 5.5%

BDL change -0.0%

BALLDONTLIE data checked 9/20/2026, 6:44:31 PM ET. Sportsbook values are consensus context, not betting advice.

Measured 2026 · Regular season

Season Production

Loading 2026 results…

Actual BALLDONTLIE box scores · FFT-computed fantasy points · Preseason excluded. Missing stats are not zeroes.

2026 / Player Game Center

Every play has a story.

Chig Okonkwo · Recorded performance, game context, fantasy takeaways.

Loading game data…

Measured game log

Weekly Performance

Actual BALLDONTLIE box scores · FFT-computed fantasy points. Missing weeks are never filled with zeroes.

No 2026 regular-season stat line recorded for Chig Okonkwo yet.

This view will populate automatically when measured games enter the data spine.

FFT Newsroom

Latest news for Chig Okonkwo

All reports

Position-relative

FFT99 Pillar Scores

Methodology

Target Command & Offensive Role

65

Average

65

Top 23% at TE

Replacement + Draft Economics

82

Strong

82

Top 17% at TE

TD / High-Value Opportunity

62

Average

62

Top 31% at TE

Receiving Talent

60

Average

60

Top 32% at TE

Offensive Ecosystem

31

Watch

31

Top 75% at TE

Fantasy Playoff Schedule

37

Watch

37

Top 73% at TE

Player Profile

Target Command & Offensive Role65
Replacement + Draft Economics82
TD / High-Value Opportunity62
Receiving Talent60
Offensive Ecosystem31
Fantasy Playoff Schedule37

Games

17

Half-PPR

68

Total TD

2

Model Component Contributions

The measured inputs doing the most work inside this grade.

Value Over Replacement
14%
Target Share
13%
Targets Per Game
10%
First-Read Share (proxy)
10%
Hierarchy
8%
RZ Target Share
5%
End Zone Share
5%
In10 Per Game
4%

Draft Economics

Value Over Replacement

-50.5

proj. half-PPR pts

Rank Delta

-31

position spots vs ADP

Value Grade

D

Reach

reachfair valuesteal

Market

149.7

FFT value

172.8

Board Δ

-23.2

Playoff Schedule

Week 15

vs ATL

Rank 29th

Tough

Week 16

@ MIN

Rank 27th

Tough

Week 17

@ JAX

Rank 10th

Great

FFT99 vs ADP

Every dot is a real position peer with a market price.

Chig OkonkwoCONSENSUS ADP →FFT99 →

Deep research dossier

Evidence, history and model transparency

The decision dashboard ends above. Open only the research sections you need below—the full evidence remains available without overwhelming the player overview.

The call record

Claims written down before the season, sealed at registration, and graded in public — misses kept.

No pre-registered call was made on Chig Okonkwo. The record holds 29 calls in total, selected from the board by signal strength and divergence — most players do not clear that bar, and silence here means we did not stake a claim on him, not that he graded badly.

2025 production

What he actually did last season. Measured, not projected.

Games

17

PPR pts

124.0

Half-PPR pts

68.0

PPR / game

7.3

Receiving

Targets

79

Receptions

56

Rec yards

560

Rec TDs

2

Target share

14.9%

Air yards share

9.1%

WOPR

0.29

Rushing

Carries

0

Rush yards

0

Rush TDs

0

Yards / carry

Passing

Pass yards

0

Pass TDs

0

Interceptions

0

nflverse season totals for 2025, joined on normalised name and position (gsis 00-0037809). These are actuals — nothing here is modelled.

What the market says

Every ADP source we hold, side by side, and where our model sits against them.

Consensus ADP

149.7

Median

142.0

Sources ranking him

3/4

Agreement

Medium

SourceRank / ADP
Yahoo ADP142.0
Sleeper ADP167.0
RTSports ADP140.0
Fantasy Football Calculator ADP (live)unranked

The sources that ranked him disagree by 27.0 picks between highest and lowest (standard deviation 12.3).

Mean and median are computed across the sources that actually ranked him — an unranked source never enters the average, because a sentinel treated as a pick number would drag a real player hundreds of slots. Spread, deviation and agreement are null under two ranked sources rather than 0, since one source cannot agree with itself. The FFT model rank is our own output and is never folded in as if it were an outside source.

Week-to-week, 2025

Consistency and range — the part a season total hides.

Weeks with a line

17

PPR / game

7.3

Std dev

4.3

Coeff. of variation

0.60

Boom rate

6% (1/17)

Bust rate

35% (6/17)

Best week

16.4 wk 16

Worst week

0.0 wk 7

Recent form — last 4 games with a line

10.1 PPR per game over weeks 15, 16, 17, 18+2.8 against his season average.

Every week (17 lines)
WkOppPPRTgtRecYdsCarRuYdTDRZ
1DEN4.943190000
2LA7.564350000
3IND11.665660000
4HOU1.43140000
5ARI8.854480000
6LV10.666460001
7NE0.02000000
8IND9.354530000
9LAC3.022100000
11HOU8.633560000
12SEA7.043400000
13JAX6.954290000
14CLE4.022200000
15SF7.364330001
16KC16.486440013
17NO14.573550010
18JAX2.25220000

The weekly LINES are measured: 2025 game logs, joined on gsis id 00-0037809. Everything derived from them above — per-game, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, boom and bust rates, recent form — is computed by us and carries the FFT model (beta) label. It is not an observed stat.

This whole block is on the PPR scale, including the thresholds — the artifact publishes boom and bust in PPR (TE: boom ≥ 15, bust ≤ 5) and converting only the points would leave the rates measured against a different ruler than the one they were defined on. The hero above is half-PPR because that is what the model ranks on. Two rulers, each labelled, rather than one silently mixed. Rates need at least 4 games to carry weight; recent form is the last 4.

Advanced usage & efficiency

Route concepts, red-zone opportunity, and separation-adjusted catch rate.

Red-zone opportunity

Scoring upside

RZ targets

5

RZ carries

RZ TDs

1

aDOT

4.5

Concept EPA / target

0.160

Classified targets

79

Catch residual

-3.111

YAC over expected

1.13

Most-run concept: SCREEN on 31.6% of his classified targets.

Every field is derived by FFT from openly-licensed nflverse play-by-play, or taken from the free public NFL Next Gen Stats endpoint. No licensed trial data (Sportradar, BALLDONTLIE) is included, which is why this file can be committed and shipped with the build. Red zone: Plays snapped inside the opponent 20-yard line. Red-zone usage measures opportunity; this repo’s own backtest shows it adds little on top of plain volume, so it is retained as context and is deliberately not described as an edge.

How the model gets there

The component projection behind the headline number, and what it was built from.

Projected games

12.1

Half-PPR (season)

53.8

PPR (season)

67.8

Confidence

low

Proj targets

38.6

Proj receptions

27.9

Proj rec yards

279

Proj rec TDs

2.0

Proj carries

0.7

Proj rush yards

2

Proj rush TDs

0.0

Proj pass yards

0

Proj pass TDs

0.0

Proj INTs

0.0

Touchdown regression

He actually scored 2 touchdowns last season. Against his measured opportunity the model expects a change of 0.0. The gap between what a player scored and what his opportunity implies is one of the four signals the edge engine reads.

What this projection was built from

17 g in 2025, 4.6 tgt/g, TE4 on depth chart, age 27, new team WAS

fft-projection-2.3.0-beta. The model reads measured production, opportunity and age, and reads no ADP field at any stage — so it can disagree with the market, which is the only reason a disagreement is worth anything. Draft capital was not resolved for this player, which the model treats as unknown rather than as undrafted.

What this page is standing on

Which sources answered for this player, and which did not.

  • Identity join: Resolved to gsis 00-0037809 via the 2025 nflverse season file. The weekly log and advanced splits are keyed on that id.
  • Market ADP: A bundled snapshot of platform ADP, not a live feed. Shown for comparison and never read by the projection model.
  • Headshot: Resolved from exact-name.
  • Vitals: Height, weight, college and jersey are read from nflverse and keyed on gsis id 00-0037809 — not on name. Name keying matches players to relatives who share one: "Marvin Harrison Jr." also matches his father's 1996 row, and whichever came first in the file would win.
  • Not shown: draft round and pick. The bundled player file carries them on roughly 48% of rows and populates them late, so a blank is equally consistent with a genuine undrafted free agent and with a first-rounder nobody has ingested yet. The model’s own three-state read is used instead, above.

Model run caveats

  • No usable red-zone RECEIVING fit for QB — receiving touchdowns at that position come from the shrunk per-target rate alone.
  • Rookie draft capital on this run: 82 drafted (projected from round/pick), 141 confirmed undrafted, 177 with capital UNKNOWN.
  • 177 of 400 rookie projections (44%) have NO KNOWN DRAFT CAPITAL because this draft class has not been ingested by any source the model can read. For those players the draft-capital path did not run: a first-round pick and a camp arm receive the same number, separated only by depth-chart order. Those projections are flagged `isPositionalFloor` and must be read as a floor for the role, not as a valuation of the player.

How the model works

Inputs, method, and the forbidden-inputs list. It reads no ADP at any stage.

Where it loses

Pre-registered calls, graded in public, misses kept on the page.

Model Rankings

Every player, with the model's BUY / FADE call against consensus ADP built into the board.