Skip to main content
Travis Etienne Jr. headshot
Position: Running backD Tier

Travis Etienne Jr.

RB · NO · Bye 8

5'10"215 lbs
FFT9984

Elite Profile

Calibrated public rating

RAW 63 · not graded

Projection

12.0

Half-PPR / game

Market ADP

39.0

Consensus overall

FFT fair value

45.5

Calibrated pick

Draft delta

-6.5

Market minus FFT

Draft recommendation

Market is aggressive

Risk / reliability

Not graded

Reliability

/ 99

Coverage

Live board

Today's Read

NO MARKET DATA

Scored 13 TDs on 62 red-zone opportunities — opportunity implies only about 10.77. Touchdown rates that far above expectation rarely repeat, and the market is paying for them.

Model rank

Market

Confidence

low

Full analysis

2026 week 2

Weekly Outlook

FFT · BDL · SLEEPER · MARKETS

Our projection

11.2

Weighted weekly consensus

BDL projection

11.3

BALLDONTLIE weekly

Sleeper projection

10.4

Sleeper weekly

Game status

Not reported

No injury description reported

Latest practice

Not reported

Game-day active

Active

Started

Yes

Participation

Played

Game market

Total · Spread

Implied team total · cross-book median

Live draft market

ADP 54.1 · Rostered 97.6%

BDL change -0.9%

BALLDONTLIE data checked 9/20/2026, 7:20:39 PM ET. Sportsbook values are consensus context, not betting advice.

Measured 2026 · Regular season

Season Production

Loading 2026 results…

Actual BALLDONTLIE box scores · FFT-computed fantasy points · Preseason excluded. Missing stats are not zeroes.

2026 / Player Game Center

Every play has a story.

Travis Etienne Jr. · Recorded performance, game context, fantasy takeaways.

Loading game data…

Measured game log

Weekly Performance

Actual BALLDONTLIE box scores · FFT-computed fantasy points. Missing weeks are never filled with zeroes.

No 2026 regular-season stat line recorded for Travis Etienne Jr. yet.

This view will populate automatically when measured games enter the data spine.

FFT Newsroom

Latest news for Travis Etienne Jr.

All reports

Position-relative

FFT99 Pillar Scores

Methodology

No FFT99 pillar profile available.

Player Profile

No FFT99 profile available.

Games

17

Half-PPR

217.9

Total TD

13

Model Component Contributions

The measured inputs doing the most work inside this grade.

No component profile.

Draft Economics

Draft value is unavailable.

Market

39.0

FFT value

45.5

Board Δ

-6.5

Playoff Schedule

Schedule grades unavailable.

FFT99 vs ADP

Every dot is a real position peer with a market price.

Deep research dossier

Evidence, history and model transparency

The decision dashboard ends above. Open only the research sections you need below—the full evidence remains available without overwhelming the player overview.

The call record

Claims written down before the season, sealed at registration, and graded in public — misses kept.

No pre-registered call was made on Travis Etienne Jr.. The record holds 29 calls in total, selected from the board by signal strength and divergence — most players do not clear that bar, and silence here means we did not stake a claim on him, not that he graded badly.

2025 production

What he actually did last season. Measured, not projected.

Games

17

PPR pts

253.9

Half-PPR pts

217.9

PPR / game

14.9

Receiving

Targets

52

Receptions

36

Rec yards

292

Rec TDs

6

Target share

9.5%

Air yards share

-1.6%

WOPR

0.13

Rushing

Carries

260

Rush yards

1107

Rush TDs

7

Yards / carry

4.26

Passing

Pass yards

0

Pass TDs

0

Interceptions

0

nflverse season totals for 2025, joined on normalised name and position (gsis 00-0036973). These are actuals — nothing here is modelled.

What the market says

Every ADP source we hold, side by side, and where our model sits against them.

Consensus ADP

39.0

Median

40.0

Sources ranking him

3/4

Agreement

High

SourceRank / ADP
Yahoo ADP41.0
Sleeper ADP40.0
RTSports ADP36.0
Fantasy Football Calculator ADP (live)unranked

The sources that ranked him disagree by 5.0 picks between highest and lowest (standard deviation 2.2).

Mean and median are computed across the sources that actually ranked him — an unranked source never enters the average, because a sentinel treated as a pick number would drag a real player hundreds of slots. Spread, deviation and agreement are null under two ranked sources rather than 0, since one source cannot agree with itself. The FFT model rank is our own output and is never folded in as if it were an outside source.

Week-to-week, 2025

Consistency and range — the part a season total hides.

Weeks with a line

17

PPR / game

14.9

Std dev

6.7

Coeff. of variation

0.45

Boom rate

18% (3/17)

Bust rate

18% (3/17)

Best week

31.5 wk 15

Worst week

4.8 wk 18

Recent form — last 4 games with a line

16.0 PPR per game over weeks 15, 16, 17, 18+1.1 against his season average.

Every week (17 lines)
WkOppPPRTgtRecYdsCarRuYdTDRZ
1CAR18.633131614304
2CIN16.93218147117
3HOU11.6200165612
4SF19.52111912411
5KC8.8439124904
6SEA9.55428122700
7LA6.5311184401
9LV16.55531228408
10HOU15.74219165817
11LAC19.3200197329
12ARI20.64330158613
13TEN5.11113122800
14IND21.2118207423
15NYJ31.54373123239
16DEN16.65416165011
17IND11.23216177602
18TEN4.8116143203

The weekly LINES are measured: 2025 game logs, joined on gsis id 00-0036973. Everything derived from them above — per-game, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, boom and bust rates, recent form — is computed by us and carries the FFT model (beta) label. It is not an observed stat.

This whole block is on the PPR scale, including the thresholds — the artifact publishes boom and bust in PPR (RB: boom ≥ 20, bust ≤ 8) and converting only the points would leave the rates measured against a different ruler than the one they were defined on. The hero above is half-PPR because that is what the model ranks on. Two rulers, each labelled, rather than one silently mixed. Rates need at least 4 games to carry weight; recent form is the last 4.

Advanced usage & efficiency

Route concepts, red-zone opportunity, and separation-adjusted catch rate.

Red-zone opportunity

Scoring upside

RZ targets

11

RZ carries

56

RZ TDs

11

aDOT

Concept EPA / target

0.242

Classified targets

57

Catch residual

YAC over expected

Most-run concept: SCREEN on 57.9% of his classified targets.

Every field is derived by FFT from openly-licensed nflverse play-by-play, or taken from the free public NFL Next Gen Stats endpoint. No licensed trial data (Sportradar, BALLDONTLIE) is included, which is why this file can be committed and shipped with the build. Red zone: Plays snapped inside the opponent 20-yard line. Red-zone usage measures opportunity; this repo’s own backtest shows it adds little on top of plain volume, so it is retained as context and is deliberately not described as an edge.

How the model gets there

The component projection behind the headline number, and what it was built from.

Projected games

14.4

Half-PPR (season)

172.6

PPR (season)

189.1

Confidence

medium

Proj targets

42.8

Proj receptions

33.0

Proj rec yards

241

Proj rec TDs

1.9

Proj carries

182.7

Proj rush yards

788

Proj rush TDs

7.2

Proj pass yards

0

Proj pass TDs

0.0

Proj INTs

0.0

Touchdown regression

He actually scored 13 touchdowns last season. Against his measured opportunity the model expects a change of -3.9. The gap between what a player scored and what his opportunity implies is one of the four signals the edge engine reads.

What this projection was built from

17 g in 2025, 15.3 car/g, 3.1 tgt/g, 60% snaps (regressed to the role, not the position), RB1 on depth chart, age 28, new team NO, -3.9 TD vs 2025 on red-zone opportunity

fft-projection-2.3.0-beta. The model reads measured production, opportunity and age, and reads no ADP field at any stage — so it can disagree with the market, which is the only reason a disagreement is worth anything. Draft capital was not resolved for this player, which the model treats as unknown rather than as undrafted.

What this page is standing on

Which sources answered for this player, and which did not.

  • Identity join: Resolved to gsis 00-0036973 via the 2025 nflverse season file. The weekly log and advanced splits are keyed on that id.
  • Market ADP: A bundled snapshot of platform ADP, not a live feed. Shown for comparison and never read by the projection model.
  • Headshot: Resolved from canonical-name.
  • Vitals: Height, weight, college and jersey are read from nflverse and keyed on gsis id 00-0036973 — not on name. Name keying matches players to relatives who share one: "Marvin Harrison Jr." also matches his father's 1996 row, and whichever came first in the file would win.
  • Not shown: draft round and pick. The bundled player file carries them on roughly 48% of rows and populates them late, so a blank is equally consistent with a genuine undrafted free agent and with a first-rounder nobody has ingested yet. The model’s own three-state read is used instead, above.

Model run caveats

  • No usable red-zone RECEIVING fit for QB — receiving touchdowns at that position come from the shrunk per-target rate alone.
  • Rookie draft capital on this run: 82 drafted (projected from round/pick), 141 confirmed undrafted, 177 with capital UNKNOWN.
  • 177 of 400 rookie projections (44%) have NO KNOWN DRAFT CAPITAL because this draft class has not been ingested by any source the model can read. For those players the draft-capital path did not run: a first-round pick and a camp arm receive the same number, separated only by depth-chart order. Those projections are flagged `isPositionalFloor` and must be read as a floor for the role, not as a valuation of the player.

How the model works

Inputs, method, and the forbidden-inputs list. It reads no ADP at any stage.

Where it loses

Pre-registered calls, graded in public, misses kept on the page.

Model Rankings

Every player, with the model's BUY / FADE call against consensus ADP built into the board.