Skip to main content
Tony Pollard headshot
Position: Running backF Tier

Tony Pollard

RB · TEN · Bye 9

Age 296'0"209 lbs7 yr
FFT9978

Elite Profile

Calibrated public rating

RAW 55 · 96% cov

Projection

10.4

Half-PPR / game

Market ADP

79.7

Consensus overall

FFT fair value

83.7

Calibrated pick

Draft delta

-4.1

Market minus FFT

Draft recommendation

Market is aggressive

Risk / reliability

Low Risk

89
Risk: Low

Reliability

89 / 99

Coverage

80%

Live board

Today's Read

NO MARKET DATA

His route-concept mix is worth -0.29 EPA per target against a 0.05 league baseline. His most common concept is flat at 56% of targets. His targets come in lower-value situations than his volume implies.

Model rank

Market

Confidence

medium

Full analysis

2026 week 2

Weekly Outlook

FFT · BDL · SLEEPER · MARKETS

Our projection

9.5

Weighted weekly consensus

BDL projection

10.2

BALLDONTLIE weekly

Sleeper projection

8.1

Sleeper weekly

Game status

Not reported

No injury description reported

Latest practice

Not reported

Game-day active

Active

Started

Yes

Participation

Played

Game market

Total · Spread

Implied team total · cross-book median

Live draft market

ADP 113.2 · Rostered 87.0%

BDL change -1.0%

BALLDONTLIE data checked 9/20/2026, 5:46:07 PM ET. Sportsbook values are consensus context, not betting advice.

Measured 2026 · Regular season

Season Production

Loading 2026 results…

Actual BALLDONTLIE box scores · FFT-computed fantasy points · Preseason excluded. Missing stats are not zeroes.

2026 / Player Game Center

Every play has a story.

Tony Pollard · Recorded performance, game context, fantasy takeaways.

Loading game data…

Measured game log

Weekly Performance

Actual BALLDONTLIE box scores · FFT-computed fantasy points. Missing weeks are never filled with zeroes.

No 2026 regular-season stat line recorded for Tony Pollard yet.

This view will populate automatically when measured games enter the data spine.

FFT Newsroom

Latest news for Tony Pollard

All reports

Position-relative

FFT99 Pillar Scores

Methodology

Opportunity / Workload

80

Strong

80

Top 10% at RB

Talent / Efficiency

55

Average

55

Top 38% at RB

Offensive Environment

19

Watch

19

Top 96% at RB

OL / Run Environment

31

Watch

31

Top 86% at RB

QB / Game-Script Fit

50

Watch

50

Top 63% at RB

Fantasy Playoff Schedule

39

Watch

39

Top 79% at RB

Player Profile

Opportunity / Workload80
Talent / Efficiency55
Offensive Environment19
OL / Run Environment31
QB / Game-Script Fit50
Fantasy Playoff Schedule39

Games

17

Half-PPR

152.8

Total TD

5

Model Component Contributions

The measured inputs doing the most work inside this grade.

Rush Share
9%
Targets Per Game
9%
Vegas
7%
Snap
6%
Inside Ten
6%
Run Tendency
6%
Route
4%
Rz Carries
4%

Draft Economics

Value Over Replacement

+8.2

proj. half-PPR pts

Rank Delta

+2

position spots vs ADP

Value Grade

B

Fair Value

reachfair valuesteal

Market

79.7

FFT value

83.7

Board Δ

-4.1

Playoff Schedule

Week 15

vs IND

Rank 23rd

Neutral

Week 16

@ LV

Rank 12th

Great

Week 17

vs PIT

Rank 25th

Tough

FFT99 vs ADP

Every dot is a real position peer with a market price.

Tony PollardCONSENSUS ADP →FFT99 →

Deep research dossier

Evidence, history and model transparency

The decision dashboard ends above. Open only the research sections you need below—the full evidence remains available without overwhelming the player overview.

The call record

Claims written down before the season, sealed at registration, and graded in public — misses kept.

No pre-registered call was made on Tony Pollard. The record holds 29 calls in total, selected from the board by signal strength and divergence — most players do not clear that bar, and silence here means we did not stake a claim on him, not that he graded badly.

2025 production

What he actually did last season. Measured, not projected.

Games

17

PPR pts

185.8

Half-PPR pts

152.8

PPR / game

10.9

Receiving

Targets

41

Receptions

33

Rec yards

206

Rec TDs

0

Target share

7.7%

Air yards share

0.3%

WOPR

0.12

Rushing

Carries

242

Rush yards

1082

Rush TDs

5

Yards / carry

4.47

Passing

Pass yards

0

Pass TDs

0

Interceptions

0

nflverse season totals for 2025, joined on normalised name and position (gsis 00-0035261). These are actuals — nothing here is modelled.

What the market says

Every ADP source we hold, side by side, and where our model sits against them.

Consensus ADP

79.7

Median

82.0

Sources ranking him

3/4

Agreement

Medium

SourceRank / ADP
Yahoo ADP85.0
Sleeper ADP82.0
RTSports ADP72.0
Fantasy Football Calculator ADP (live)unranked

The sources that ranked him disagree by 13.0 picks between highest and lowest (standard deviation 5.6).

Mean and median are computed across the sources that actually ranked him — an unranked source never enters the average, because a sentinel treated as a pick number would drag a real player hundreds of slots. Spread, deviation and agreement are null under two ranked sources rather than 0, since one source cannot agree with itself. The FFT model rank is our own output and is never folded in as if it were an outside source.

Week-to-week, 2025

Consistency and range — the part a season total hides.

Weeks with a line

17

PPR / game

10.9

Std dev

5.5

Coeff. of variation

0.50

Boom rate

6% (1/17)

Bust rate

35% (6/17)

Best week

28.1 wk 14

Worst week

5.3 wk 13

Recent form — last 4 games with a line

12.3 PPR per game over weeks 15, 16, 17, 18+1.4 against his season average.

Every week (17 lines)
WkOppPPRTgtRecYdsCarRuYdTDRZ
1DEN7.91129186003
2LA9.2100209200
3IND13.94214164513
4HOU10.63312146400
5ARI14.83311146712
6LV6.72213103401
7NE12.1664361800
8IND6.3219114401
9LAC7.82112105603
11HOU5.6334102200
12SEA8.15421112000
13JAX5.3213106000
14CLE28.10002516121
15SF18.22181410412
16KC10.20002110202
17NO11.52210188501
18JAX9.53317144801

The weekly LINES are measured: 2025 game logs, joined on gsis id 00-0035261. Everything derived from them above — per-game, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, boom and bust rates, recent form — is computed by us and carries the FFT model (beta) label. It is not an observed stat.

This whole block is on the PPR scale, including the thresholds — the artifact publishes boom and bust in PPR (RB: boom ≥ 20, bust ≤ 8) and converting only the points would leave the rates measured against a different ruler than the one they were defined on. The hero above is half-PPR because that is what the model ranks on. Two rulers, each labelled, rather than one silently mixed. Rates need at least 4 games to carry weight; recent form is the last 4.

Advanced usage & efficiency

Route concepts, red-zone opportunity, and separation-adjusted catch rate.

Red-zone opportunity

Scoring upside

RZ targets

1

RZ carries

19

RZ TDs

3

aDOT

Concept EPA / target

-0.288

Classified targets

41

Catch residual

YAC over expected

Most-run concept: FLAT on 56.1% of his classified targets.

Every field is derived by FFT from openly-licensed nflverse play-by-play, or taken from the free public NFL Next Gen Stats endpoint. No licensed trial data (Sportradar, BALLDONTLIE) is included, which is why this file can be committed and shipped with the build. Red zone: Plays snapped inside the opponent 20-yard line. Red-zone usage measures opportunity; this repo’s own backtest shows it adds little on top of plain volume, so it is retained as context and is deliberately not described as an edge.

How the model gets there

The component projection behind the headline number, and what it was built from.

Projected games

14.0

Half-PPR (season)

146.2

PPR (season)

160.5

Confidence

high

Proj targets

36.6

Proj receptions

28.5

Proj rec yards

194

Proj rec TDs

1.2

Proj carries

177.4

Proj rush yards

774

Proj rush TDs

4.9

Proj pass yards

0

Proj pass TDs

0.0

Proj INTs

0.0

Touchdown regression

He actually scored 5 touchdowns last season. Against his measured opportunity the model expects a change of 1.1. The gap between what a player scored and what his opportunity implies is one of the four signals the edge engine reads.

What this projection was built from

17 g in 2025, 14.2 car/g, 2.4 tgt/g, 62% snaps (regressed to the role, not the position), RB1 on depth chart, age 29

fft-projection-2.3.0-beta. The model reads measured production, opportunity and age, and reads no ADP field at any stage — so it can disagree with the market, which is the only reason a disagreement is worth anything. Draft capital was not resolved for this player, which the model treats as unknown rather than as undrafted.

What this page is standing on

Which sources answered for this player, and which did not.

  • Identity join: Resolved to gsis 00-0035261 via the 2025 nflverse season file. The weekly log and advanced splits are keyed on that id.
  • Market ADP: A bundled snapshot of platform ADP, not a live feed. Shown for comparison and never read by the projection model.
  • Headshot: Resolved from exact-name.
  • Vitals: Height, weight, college and jersey are read from nflverse and keyed on gsis id 00-0035261 — not on name. Name keying matches players to relatives who share one: "Marvin Harrison Jr." also matches his father's 1996 row, and whichever came first in the file would win.
  • Not shown: draft round and pick. The bundled player file carries them on roughly 48% of rows and populates them late, so a blank is equally consistent with a genuine undrafted free agent and with a first-rounder nobody has ingested yet. The model’s own three-state read is used instead, above.

Model run caveats

  • No usable red-zone RECEIVING fit for QB — receiving touchdowns at that position come from the shrunk per-target rate alone.
  • Rookie draft capital on this run: 82 drafted (projected from round/pick), 141 confirmed undrafted, 177 with capital UNKNOWN.
  • 177 of 400 rookie projections (44%) have NO KNOWN DRAFT CAPITAL because this draft class has not been ingested by any source the model can read. For those players the draft-capital path did not run: a first-round pick and a camp arm receive the same number, separated only by depth-chart order. Those projections are flagged `isPositionalFloor` and must be read as a floor for the role, not as a valuation of the player.

How the model works

Inputs, method, and the forbidden-inputs list. It reads no ADP at any stage.

Where it loses

Pre-registered calls, graded in public, misses kept on the page.

Model Rankings

Every player, with the model's BUY / FADE call against consensus ADP built into the board.