Skip to main content
Sam LaPorta headshot
Position: Tight endG Tier

Sam LaPorta

TE · DET · Bye 6

Age 256'3"245 lbs3 yr
FFT9977

Elite Profile

Calibrated public rating

RAW 69 · 89% cov

Projection

8.5

Half-PPR / game

Market ADP

77.3

Consensus overall

FFT fair value

94.6

Calibrated pick

Draft delta

-17.3

Market minus FFT

Draft recommendation

Market is aggressive

Risk / reliability

Medium Risk

59
Risk: Medium

Reliability

59 / 99

Coverage

80%

Live board

Today's Read

NO MARKET DATA

His route-concept mix is worth 0.74 EPA per target against a 0.05 league baseline. His most common concept is flat at 29% of targets. He is used in higher-value ways than his target count alone suggests.

Model rank

Market

Confidence

medium

Full analysis

2026 week 2

Weekly Outlook

FFT · BDL · SLEEPER · MARKETS

Our projection

8.7

Weighted weekly consensus

BDL projection

9.0

BALLDONTLIE weekly

Sleeper projection

9.0

Sleeper weekly

Game status

Not reported

No injury description reported

Latest practice

Not reported

Game-day active

Active

Started

Yes

Participation

Played

Game market

Total · Spread

Implied team total · cross-book median

Live draft market

ADP 79.8 · Rostered 96.1%

BDL change +0.0%

BALLDONTLIE data checked 9/20/2026, 5:44:14 PM ET. Sportsbook values are consensus context, not betting advice.

Measured 2026 · Regular season

Season Production

Loading 2026 results…

Actual BALLDONTLIE box scores · FFT-computed fantasy points · Preseason excluded. Missing stats are not zeroes.

2026 / Player Game Center

Every play has a story.

Sam LaPorta · Recorded performance, game context, fantasy takeaways.

Loading game data…

Measured game log

Weekly Performance

Actual BALLDONTLIE box scores · FFT-computed fantasy points. Missing weeks are never filled with zeroes.

No 2026 regular-season stat line recorded for Sam LaPorta yet.

This view will populate automatically when measured games enter the data spine.

FFT Newsroom

Latest news for Sam LaPorta

All reports

Position-relative

FFT99 Pillar Scores

Methodology

Target Command & Offensive Role

74

Strong

74

Top 13% at TE

Replacement + Draft Economics

96

Elite

96

Top 3% at TE

TD / High-Value Opportunity

64

Average

64

Top 26% at TE

Receiving Talent

77

Strong

77

Top 12% at TE

Offensive Ecosystem

69

Average

69

Top 10% at TE

Fantasy Playoff Schedule

31

Watch

31

Top 88% at TE

Player Profile

Target Command & Offensive Role74
Replacement + Draft Economics96
TD / High-Value Opportunity64
Receiving Talent77
Offensive Ecosystem69
Fantasy Playoff Schedule31

Games

9

Half-PPR

66.9

Total TD

3

Model Component Contributions

The measured inputs doing the most work inside this grade.

Value Over Replacement
12%
Target Share
10%
Targets Per Game
8%
First-Read Share (proxy)
8%
Hierarchy
6%
Routes
6%
YPRR (Efficiency)
5%
RZ Target Share
4%

Draft Economics

Value Over Replacement

+17.9

proj. half-PPR pts

Rank Delta

+0

position spots vs ADP

Value Grade

B

Fair Value

reachfair valuesteal

Market

77.3

FFT value

94.6

Board Δ

-17.3

Playoff Schedule

Week 15

@ MIN

Rank 27th

Tough

Week 16

vs NYG

Rank 24th

Neutral

Week 17

@ CHI

Rank 18th

Neutral

FFT99 vs ADP

Every dot is a real position peer with a market price.

Sam LaPortaCONSENSUS ADP →FFT99 →

Deep research dossier

Evidence, history and model transparency

The decision dashboard ends above. Open only the research sections you need below—the full evidence remains available without overwhelming the player overview.

The call record

Claims written down before the season, sealed at registration, and graded in public — misses kept.

No pre-registered call was made on Sam LaPorta. The record holds 29 calls in total, selected from the board by signal strength and divergence — most players do not clear that bar, and silence here means we did not stake a claim on him, not that he graded badly.

2025 production

What he actually did last season. Measured, not projected.

Games

9

PPR pts

106.9

Half-PPR pts

66.9

PPR / game

11.9

Receiving

Targets

49

Receptions

40

Rec yards

489

Rec TDs

3

Target share

8.9%

Air yards share

7.4%

WOPR

0.19

Rushing

Carries

0

Rush yards

0

Rush TDs

0

Yards / carry

Passing

Pass yards

0

Pass TDs

0

Interceptions

0

nflverse season totals for 2025, joined on normalised name and position (gsis 00-0039065). These are actuals — nothing here is modelled.

What the market says

Every ADP source we hold, side by side, and where our model sits against them.

Consensus ADP

77.3

Median

79.0

Sources ranking him

3/4

Agreement

Medium

SourceRank / ADP
Yahoo ADP64.0
Sleeper ADP79.0
RTSports ADP89.0
Fantasy Football Calculator ADP (live)unranked

The sources that ranked him disagree by 25.0 picks between highest and lowest (standard deviation 10.3).

Mean and median are computed across the sources that actually ranked him — an unranked source never enters the average, because a sentinel treated as a pick number would drag a real player hundreds of slots. Spread, deviation and agreement are null under two ranked sources rather than 0, since one source cannot agree with itself. The FFT model rank is our own output and is never folded in as if it were an outside source.

Week-to-week, 2025

Consistency and range — the part a season total hides.

Weeks with a line

9

PPR / game

11.9

Std dev

6.1

Coeff. of variation

0.51

Boom rate

33% (3/9)

Bust rate

11% (1/9)

Best week

21.7 wk 9

Worst week

4.5 wk 7

Recent form — last 4 games with a line

13.3 PPR per game over weeks 6, 7, 9, 10+1.4 against his season average.

Every week (9 lines)
WkOppPPRTgtRecYdsCarRuYdTDRZ
1GB13.996790002
2CHI5.643260000
3BAL7.344330001
4CLE6.943390000
5CIN20.265920011
6KC16.565550011
7TB4.533150000
9MIN21.786970010
10WAS10.355530001

The weekly LINES are measured: 2025 game logs, joined on gsis id 00-0039065. Everything derived from them above — per-game, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, boom and bust rates, recent form — is computed by us and carries the FFT model (beta) label. It is not an observed stat.

This whole block is on the PPR scale, including the thresholds — the artifact publishes boom and bust in PPR (TE: boom ≥ 15, bust ≤ 5) and converting only the points would leave the rates measured against a different ruler than the one they were defined on. The hero above is half-PPR because that is what the model ranks on. Two rulers, each labelled, rather than one silently mixed. Rates need at least 4 games to carry weight; recent form is the last 4.

Advanced usage & efficiency

Route concepts, red-zone opportunity, and separation-adjusted catch rate.

Red-zone opportunity

Scoring upside

RZ targets

6

RZ carries

RZ TDs

2

aDOT

5.6

Concept EPA / target

0.743

Classified targets

49

Catch residual

9.572

YAC over expected

1.02

Most-run concept: FLAT on 28.6% of his classified targets.

Every field is derived by FFT from openly-licensed nflverse play-by-play, or taken from the free public NFL Next Gen Stats endpoint. No licensed trial data (Sportradar, BALLDONTLIE) is included, which is why this file can be committed and shipped with the build. Red zone: Plays snapped inside the opponent 20-yard line. Red-zone usage measures opportunity; this repo’s own backtest shows it adds little on top of plain volume, so it is retained as context and is deliberately not described as an edge.

How the model gets there

The component projection behind the headline number, and what it was built from.

Projected games

14.3

Half-PPR (season)

122.2

PPR (season)

151.9

Confidence

medium

Proj targets

79.1

Proj receptions

59.3

Proj rec yards

654

Proj rec TDs

4.5

Proj carries

0.8

Proj rush yards

2

Proj rush TDs

0.0

Proj pass yards

0

Proj pass TDs

0.0

Proj INTs

0.0

Touchdown regression

He actually scored 3 touchdowns last season. Against his measured opportunity the model expects a change of 1.6. The gap between what a player scored and what his opportunity implies is one of the four signals the edge engine reads.

What this projection was built from

9 g in 2025, 5.4 tgt/g, 91% snaps (regressed to the role, not the position), TE1 on depth chart, age 26, +1.6 TD vs 2025 on red-zone opportunity

fft-projection-2.3.0-beta. The model reads measured production, opportunity and age, and reads no ADP field at any stage — so it can disagree with the market, which is the only reason a disagreement is worth anything. Draft capital was not resolved for this player, which the model treats as unknown rather than as undrafted.

What this page is standing on

Which sources answered for this player, and which did not.

  • Identity join: Resolved to gsis 00-0039065 via the 2025 nflverse season file. The weekly log and advanced splits are keyed on that id.
  • Market ADP: A bundled snapshot of platform ADP, not a live feed. Shown for comparison and never read by the projection model.
  • Headshot: Resolved from exact-name.
  • Vitals: Height, weight, college and jersey are read from nflverse and keyed on gsis id 00-0039065 — not on name. Name keying matches players to relatives who share one: "Marvin Harrison Jr." also matches his father's 1996 row, and whichever came first in the file would win.
  • Not shown: draft round and pick. The bundled player file carries them on roughly 48% of rows and populates them late, so a blank is equally consistent with a genuine undrafted free agent and with a first-rounder nobody has ingested yet. The model’s own three-state read is used instead, above.

Model run caveats

  • No usable red-zone RECEIVING fit for QB — receiving touchdowns at that position come from the shrunk per-target rate alone.
  • Rookie draft capital on this run: 82 drafted (projected from round/pick), 141 confirmed undrafted, 177 with capital UNKNOWN.
  • 177 of 400 rookie projections (44%) have NO KNOWN DRAFT CAPITAL because this draft class has not been ingested by any source the model can read. For those players the draft-capital path did not run: a first-round pick and a camp arm receive the same number, separated only by depth-chart order. Those projections are flagged `isPositionalFloor` and must be read as a floor for the role, not as a valuation of the player.

How the model works

Inputs, method, and the forbidden-inputs list. It reads no ADP at any stage.

Where it loses

Pre-registered calls, graded in public, misses kept on the page.

Model Rankings

Every player, with the model's BUY / FADE call against consensus ADP built into the board.