Live board
Today's Read
Los Angeles Chargers is not currently in the scored edge pool.
Full analysis
Position: Defense and special teamsN Tier
Los Angeles Chargers
DST · LAC · Bye 7
FFT9961
Elite Profile
Calibrated public rating
RAW 58 · 54% cov
Projection
—
Half-PPR / game
Market ADP
221.3
Consensus overall
FFT fair value
214.0
Calibrated pick
Draft delta
+7.3
Market minus FFT
Draft recommendation
Target ahead of market
Risk / reliability
Low Risk
85
Reliability
85 / 99
Coverage
25%
2026 week 2
Weekly Outlook
Our projection
—
Weighted weekly consensus
BDL projection
6.8
BALLDONTLIE weekly
Sleeper projection
8.2
Sleeper weekly
Game status
Not reported
No injury description reported
Game market
Total — · Spread —
Implied team total — · cross-book median
Live draft market
ADP 165.2 · Rostered 43.0%
BDL change -0.5%
BALLDONTLIE data checked 9/20/2026, 5:47:45 PM ET. Sportsbook values are consensus context, not betting advice.
Measured 2026 · Regular season
Season Production
Loading 2026 results…
Actual BALLDONTLIE box scores · FFT-computed fantasy points · Preseason excluded. Missing stats are not zeroes.
2026 / Player Game Center
Every play has a story.
Los Angeles Chargers · Recorded performance, game context, fantasy takeaways.
Loading game data…
Measured game log
Weekly Performance
Actual BALLDONTLIE box scores · FFT-computed fantasy points. Missing weeks are never filled with zeroes.
No 2026 regular-season stat line recorded for Los Angeles Chargers yet.
This view will populate automatically when measured games enter the data spine.
FFT Newsroom
Latest news for Los Angeles Chargers
Position-relative
FFT99 Pillar Scores
Disruption / Pass Rush
75
Strong
75
Top 27% at DST
Turnover Engine
70
Strong
70
Top 25% at DST
Opponent Attackability / Schedule
53
Watch
53
Top 33% at DST
Vegas Environment
60
Average
60
Top 33% at DST
Scoring Suppression
78
Strong
78
Top 20% at DST
Replacement + Draft Economics
68
Average
68
Top 30% at DST
Fantasy Playoff Schedule
51
Watch
51
Top 44% at DST
Player Profile
Disruption / Pass Rush75
Turnover Engine70
Opponent Attackability / Schedule53
Vegas Environment60
Scoring Suppression78
Replacement + Draft Economics68
Games
—
Half-PPR
—
Total TD
—
Model Component Contributions
The measured inputs doing the most work inside this grade.
Sack Rate
13%
Avg. Opponent Implied Total
12%
Coverage / INT Opportunity
10%
Opponent Sack Rate Allowed
10%
Forced Fumble Rate
8%
Opponent Pass-Pro Quality
8%
Expected Dropbacks
6%
EPA/Play Allowed
5%
Draft Economics
Value Over Replacement
—
proj. half-PPR pts
Rank Delta
—
position spots vs ADP
Value Grade
—
insufficient data
reachfair valuesteal
Market
221.3
FFT value
214.0
Board Δ
+7.3
Playoff Schedule
Schedule grades unavailable.
FFT99 vs ADP
Every dot is a real position peer with a market price.
Compare Players
Deep research dossier
Evidence, history and model transparency
The decision dashboard ends above. Open only the research sections you need below—the full evidence remains available without overwhelming the player overview.
The call record
Claims written down before the season, sealed at registration, and graded in public — misses kept.
The call record
Claims written down before the season, sealed at registration, and graded in public — misses kept.
No pre-registered call was made on Los Angeles Chargers. The record holds 29 calls in total, selected from the board by signal strength and divergence — most players do not clear that bar, and silence here means we did not stake a claim on him, not that he graded badly.
2025 production
What he actually did last season. Measured, not projected.
2025 production
What he actually did last season. Measured, not projected.
No 2025 nflverse row matched this player, so no gsis id could be resolved. The weekly log and the advanced splits are both gsis-keyed, so they are unavailable for him. This is a join gap, not a statement about the player.
What the market says
Every ADP source we hold, side by side, and where our model sits against them.
What the market says
Every ADP source we hold, side by side, and where our model sits against them.
Consensus ADP
221.3
Median
219.0
Sources ranking him
3/4
Agreement
Medium
| Source | Rank / ADP |
|---|---|
| Yahoo ADP | 213.0 |
| Sleeper ADP | 219.0 |
| RTSports ADP | 232.0 |
| Fantasy Football Calculator ADP (live) | unranked |
The sources that ranked him disagree by 19.0 picks between highest and lowest (standard deviation 7.9).
Mean and median are computed across the sources that actually ranked him — an unranked source never enters the average, because a sentinel treated as a pick number would drag a real player hundreds of slots. Spread, deviation and agreement are null under two ranked sources rather than 0, since one source cannot agree with itself. The FFT model rank is our own output and is never folded in as if it were an outside source.
Week-to-week, 2025
Consistency and range — the part a season total hides.
Week-to-week, 2025
Consistency and range — the part a season total hides.
No 2025 nflverse row matched this player, so no gsis id could be resolved. The weekly log and the advanced splits are both gsis-keyed, so they are unavailable for him. This is a join gap, not a statement about the player.
Advanced usage & efficiency
Route concepts, red-zone opportunity, and separation-adjusted catch rate.
Advanced usage & efficiency
Route concepts, red-zone opportunity, and separation-adjusted catch rate.
No 2025 nflverse row matched this player, so no gsis id could be resolved. The weekly log and the advanced splits are both gsis-keyed, so they are unavailable for him. This is a join gap, not a statement about the player.
How the model gets there
The component projection behind the headline number, and what it was built from.
How the model gets there
The component projection behind the headline number, and what it was built from.
The model produced no projection for this player. It projects from measured production and opportunity, so a player with no prior stat line who is also not flagged as a rookie in any ingested source cannot be projected. He is reported unprojected rather than given a placeholder.
What this page is standing on
Which sources answered for this player, and which did not.
What this page is standing on
Which sources answered for this player, and which did not.
- Identity join: No 2025 nflverse row matched this player, so no gsis id could be resolved. The weekly log and the advanced splits are both gsis-keyed, so they are unavailable for him. This is a join gap, not a statement about the player.
- Market ADP: A bundled snapshot of platform ADP, not a live feed. Shown for comparison and never read by the projection model.
- Headshot: Resolved from team-logo.
- Vitals: No nflverse player row resolved for this gsis id, so no vitals are shown. Nothing is guessed from the name.
- Not shown: draft round and pick. The bundled player file carries them on roughly 48% of rows and populates them late, so a blank is equally consistent with a genuine undrafted free agent and with a first-rounder nobody has ingested yet. The model’s own three-state read is used instead, above.
Model run caveats
- No usable red-zone RECEIVING fit for QB — receiving touchdowns at that position come from the shrunk per-target rate alone.
- Rookie draft capital on this run: 82 drafted (projected from round/pick), 141 confirmed undrafted, 177 with capital UNKNOWN.
- 177 of 400 rookie projections (44%) have NO KNOWN DRAFT CAPITAL because this draft class has not been ingested by any source the model can read. For those players the draft-capital path did not run: a first-round pick and a camp arm receive the same number, separated only by depth-chart order. Those projections are flagged `isPositionalFloor` and must be read as a floor for the role, not as a valuation of the player.
How the model works
Inputs, method, and the forbidden-inputs list. It reads no ADP at any stage.
Where it loses
Pre-registered calls, graded in public, misses kept on the page.
Model Rankings
Every player, with the model's BUY / FADE call against consensus ADP built into the board.