Skip to main content
Jordan Addison headshot
Position: Wide receiverG Tier

Jordan Addison

WR · MIN · Bye 6

Age 245'11"179 lbs3 yr
FFT9976

Elite Profile

Calibrated public rating

RAW 63 · 100% cov

Projection

8.6

Half-PPR / game

Market ADP

111.7

Consensus overall

FFT fair value

94.6

Calibrated pick

Draft delta

+17.0

Market minus FFT

Draft recommendation

Target ahead of market

Risk / reliability

Medium Risk

72
Risk: Medium

Reliability

72 / 99

Coverage

80%

Live board

Today's Read

NO MARKET DATA

catches 4.5 points less often than his 14.39-yard target depth predicts, and +0.6 yards after catch versus expectation. That is earned production rather than volume, and it tends to persist.

Model rank

Market

Confidence

low

Full analysis

2026 week 2

Weekly Outlook

FFT · BDL · SLEEPER · MARKETS

Our projection

8.9

Weighted weekly consensus

BDL projection

8.8

BALLDONTLIE weekly

Sleeper projection

9.2

Sleeper weekly

Game status

Not reported

No injury description reported

Latest practice

Not reported

Game-day active

Active

Started

Yes

Participation

Played

Game market

Total · Spread

Implied team total · cross-book median

Live draft market

ADP 140.5 · Rostered 75.0%

BDL change -0.3%

BALLDONTLIE data checked 9/20/2026, 5:45:43 PM ET. Sportsbook values are consensus context, not betting advice.

Measured 2026 · Regular season

Season Production

Loading 2026 results…

Actual BALLDONTLIE box scores · FFT-computed fantasy points · Preseason excluded. Missing stats are not zeroes.

2026 / Player Game Center

Every play has a story.

Jordan Addison · Recorded performance, game context, fantasy takeaways.

Loading game data…

Measured game log

Weekly Performance

Actual BALLDONTLIE box scores · FFT-computed fantasy points. Missing weeks are never filled with zeroes.

No 2026 regular-season stat line recorded for Jordan Addison yet.

This view will populate automatically when measured games enter the data spine.

FFT Newsroom

Latest news for Jordan Addison

All reports

Position-relative

FFT99 Pillar Scores

Methodology

Opportunity

86

Elite

86

Top 6% at WR

Talent

63

Average

63

Top 31% at WR

Offensive Environment

47

Watch

47

Top 57% at WR

QB Play

29

Watch

29

Top 88% at WR

Fantasy Playoff Schedule

68

Average

68

Top 13% at WR

Player Profile

Opportunity86
Talent63
Offensive Environment47
QB Play29
Fantasy Playoff Schedule68

Games

14

Half-PPR

93.1

Total TD

4

Model Component Contributions

The measured inputs doing the most work inside this grade.

Target Share
11%
YPRR (Efficiency)
9%
Targets Per Game
7%
First-Read Share (proxy)
7%
Vegas
7%
TPRR
7%
Play Caller
6%
Age Prod
5%

Draft Economics

Value Over Replacement

+2.1

proj. half-PPR pts

Rank Delta

+14

position spots vs ADP

Value Grade

A

Great Value

reachfair valuesteal

Market

111.7

FFT value

94.6

Board Δ

+17.0

Playoff Schedule

Week 15

vs DET

Rank 5th

Elite

Week 16

vs WAS

Rank 8th

Elite

Week 17

@ NYJ

Rank 17th

Neutral

FFT99 vs ADP

Every dot is a real position peer with a market price.

Jordan AddisonCONSENSUS ADP →FFT99 →

Deep research dossier

Evidence, history and model transparency

The decision dashboard ends above. Open only the research sections you need below—the full evidence remains available without overwhelming the player overview.

The call record

Claims written down before the season, sealed at registration, and graded in public — misses kept.

No pre-registered call was made on Jordan Addison. The record holds 29 calls in total, selected from the board by signal strength and divergence — most players do not clear that bar, and silence here means we did not stake a claim on him, not that he graded badly.

2025 production

What he actually did last season. Measured, not projected.

Games

14

PPR pts

135.1

Half-PPR pts

93.1

PPR / game

9.7

Receiving

Targets

79

Receptions

42

Rec yards

610

Rec TDs

3

Target share

16.9%

Air yards share

28.8%

WOPR

0.45

Rushing

Carries

2

Rush yards

81

Rush TDs

1

Yards / carry

40.50

Passing

Pass yards

0

Pass TDs

0

Interceptions

0

nflverse season totals for 2025, joined on normalised name and position (gsis 00-0038994). These are actuals — nothing here is modelled.

What the market says

Every ADP source we hold, side by side, and where our model sits against them.

Consensus ADP

111.7

Median

112.0

Sources ranking him

3/4

Agreement

Medium

SourceRank / ADP
Yahoo ADP123.0
Sleeper ADP100.0
RTSports ADP112.0
Fantasy Football Calculator ADP (live)unranked

The sources that ranked him disagree by 23.0 picks between highest and lowest (standard deviation 9.4).

Mean and median are computed across the sources that actually ranked him — an unranked source never enters the average, because a sentinel treated as a pick number would drag a real player hundreds of slots. Spread, deviation and agreement are null under two ranked sources rather than 0, since one source cannot agree with itself. The FFT model rank is our own output and is never folded in as if it were an outside source.

Week-to-week, 2025

Consistency and range — the part a season total hides.

Weeks with a line

14

PPR / game

9.7

Std dev

5.5

Coeff. of variation

0.57

Boom rate

7% (1/14)

Bust rate

29% (4/14)

Best week

21.8 wk 7

Worst week

0.0 wk 12

Recent form — last 4 games with a line

6.9 PPR per game over weeks 15, 16, 17, 18-2.8 against his season average.

Every week (14 lines)
WkOppPPRTgtRecYdsCarRuYdTDRZ
4PIT15.4841140000
5CLE15.165410012
7PHI21.81291280004
8LAC11.643260011
9DET8.4424811600
10BAL6.5113350002
11CHI10.072200011
12GB0.01000000
13SEA8.6105360001
14WAS10.274620001
15DAL8.622660000
16NYG4.632260000
17DET12.510016510
18GB1.83180001

The weekly LINES are measured: 2025 game logs, joined on gsis id 00-0038994. Everything derived from them above — per-game, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, boom and bust rates, recent form — is computed by us and carries the FFT model (beta) label. It is not an observed stat.

This whole block is on the PPR scale, including the thresholds — the artifact publishes boom and bust in PPR (WR: boom ≥ 20, bust ≤ 8) and converting only the points would leave the rates measured against a different ruler than the one they were defined on. The hero above is half-PPR because that is what the model ranks on. Two rulers, each labelled, rather than one silently mixed. Rates need at least 4 games to carry weight; recent form is the last 4.

Advanced usage & efficiency

Route concepts, red-zone opportunity, and separation-adjusted catch rate.

Red-zone opportunity

Scoring upside

RZ targets

13

RZ carries

RZ TDs

3

aDOT

14.4

Concept EPA / target

0.177

Classified targets

79

Catch residual

-4.504

YAC over expected

0.60

Most-run concept: QUICK_OUT on 26.6% of his classified targets.

Every field is derived by FFT from openly-licensed nflverse play-by-play, or taken from the free public NFL Next Gen Stats endpoint. No licensed trial data (Sportradar, BALLDONTLIE) is included, which is why this file can be committed and shipped with the build. Red zone: Plays snapped inside the opponent 20-yard line. Red-zone usage measures opportunity; this repo’s own backtest shows it adds little on top of plain volume, so it is retained as context and is deliberately not described as an edge.

How the model gets there

The component projection behind the headline number, and what it was built from.

Projected games

14.2

Half-PPR (season)

122.4

PPR (season)

147.8

Confidence

medium

Proj targets

85.6

Proj receptions

50.8

Proj rec yards

684

Proj rec TDs

4.5

Proj carries

2.2

Proj rush yards

12

Proj rush TDs

0.1

Proj pass yards

0

Proj pass TDs

0.0

Proj INTs

0.0

Touchdown regression

He actually scored 4 touchdowns last season. Against his measured opportunity the model expects a change of 0.6. The gap between what a player scored and what his opportunity implies is one of the four signals the edge engine reads.

What this projection was built from

14 g in 2025, 5.6 tgt/g, 85% snaps (regressed to the role, not the position), RWR2 on depth chart, age 25

fft-projection-2.3.0-beta. The model reads measured production, opportunity and age, and reads no ADP field at any stage — so it can disagree with the market, which is the only reason a disagreement is worth anything. Draft capital was not resolved for this player, which the model treats as unknown rather than as undrafted.

What this page is standing on

Which sources answered for this player, and which did not.

  • Identity join: Resolved to gsis 00-0038994 via the 2025 nflverse season file. The weekly log and advanced splits are keyed on that id.
  • Market ADP: A bundled snapshot of platform ADP, not a live feed. Shown for comparison and never read by the projection model.
  • Headshot: Resolved from exact-name.
  • Vitals: Height, weight, college and jersey are read from nflverse and keyed on gsis id 00-0038994 — not on name. Name keying matches players to relatives who share one: "Marvin Harrison Jr." also matches his father's 1996 row, and whichever came first in the file would win.
  • Not shown: draft round and pick. The bundled player file carries them on roughly 48% of rows and populates them late, so a blank is equally consistent with a genuine undrafted free agent and with a first-rounder nobody has ingested yet. The model’s own three-state read is used instead, above.

Model run caveats

  • No usable red-zone RECEIVING fit for QB — receiving touchdowns at that position come from the shrunk per-target rate alone.
  • Rookie draft capital on this run: 82 drafted (projected from round/pick), 141 confirmed undrafted, 177 with capital UNKNOWN.
  • 177 of 400 rookie projections (44%) have NO KNOWN DRAFT CAPITAL because this draft class has not been ingested by any source the model can read. For those players the draft-capital path did not run: a first-round pick and a camp arm receive the same number, separated only by depth-chart order. Those projections are flagged `isPositionalFloor` and must be read as a floor for the role, not as a valuation of the player.

How the model works

Inputs, method, and the forbidden-inputs list. It reads no ADP at any stage.

Where it loses

Pre-registered calls, graded in public, misses kept on the page.

Model Rankings

Every player, with the model's BUY / FADE call against consensus ADP built into the board.