Skip to main content
Jauan Jennings headshot
Position: Wide receiverJ Tier

Jauan Jennings

WR · MIN · Bye 6

Age 296'3"212 lbs6 yr
FFT9968

Elite Profile

Calibrated public rating

RAW 58 · 100% cov

Projection

6.5

Half-PPR / game

Market ADP

163.0

Consensus overall

FFT fair value

166.0

Calibrated pick

Draft delta

-3.0

Market minus FFT

Draft recommendation

Market is aggressive

Risk / reliability

Medium Risk

48
Risk: Medium

Reliability

48 / 99

Coverage

80%

Live board

Today's Read

NO MARKET DATA

Scored 9 TDs on 19 red-zone opportunities — opportunity implies only about 3.88. Touchdown rates that far above expectation rarely repeat, and the market is paying for them.

Model rank

Market

Confidence

medium

Full analysis

2026 week 2

Weekly Outlook

FFT · BDL · SLEEPER · MARKETS

Our projection

0.0

Weighted weekly consensus

BDL projection

BALLDONTLIE weekly

Sleeper projection

Sleeper weekly

Game status

Inactive

No injury description reported

Game market

Total · Spread

Implied team total · cross-book median

Live draft market

ADP 170.5 · Rostered 6.1%

BDL change -0.1%

BALLDONTLIE data checked 9/20/2026, 5:47:19 PM ET. Sportsbook values are consensus context, not betting advice.

Measured 2026 · Regular season

Season Production

Loading 2026 results…

Actual BALLDONTLIE box scores · FFT-computed fantasy points · Preseason excluded. Missing stats are not zeroes.

2026 / Player Game Center

Every play has a story.

Jauan Jennings · Recorded performance, game context, fantasy takeaways.

Loading game data…

Measured game log

Weekly Performance

Actual BALLDONTLIE box scores · FFT-computed fantasy points. Missing weeks are never filled with zeroes.

No 2026 regular-season stat line recorded for Jauan Jennings yet.

This view will populate automatically when measured games enter the data spine.

FFT Newsroom

Latest news for Jauan Jennings

All reports

Position-relative

FFT99 Pillar Scores

Methodology

Opportunity

75

Strong

75

Top 13% at WR

Talent

57

Average

57

Top 40% at WR

Offensive Environment

47

Watch

47

Top 57% at WR

QB Play

29

Watch

29

Top 88% at WR

Fantasy Playoff Schedule

68

Average

68

Top 13% at WR

Player Profile

Opportunity75
Talent57
Offensive Environment47
QB Play29
Fantasy Playoff Schedule68

Games

15

Half-PPR

118.3

Total TD

9

Model Component Contributions

The measured inputs doing the most work inside this grade.

Target Share
11%
YPRR (Efficiency)
9%
Targets Per Game
7%
First-Read Share (proxy)
7%
Vegas
7%
TPRR
7%
Play Caller
6%
Age Prod
5%

Draft Economics

Value Over Replacement

-43.3

proj. half-PPR pts

Rank Delta

-10

position spots vs ADP

Value Grade

D

Reach

reachfair valuesteal

Market

163.0

FFT value

166.0

Board Δ

-3.0

Playoff Schedule

Week 15

vs DET

Rank 5th

Elite

Week 16

vs WAS

Rank 8th

Elite

Week 17

@ NYJ

Rank 17th

Neutral

FFT99 vs ADP

Every dot is a real position peer with a market price.

Jauan JenningsCONSENSUS ADP →FFT99 →

Deep research dossier

Evidence, history and model transparency

The decision dashboard ends above. Open only the research sections you need below—the full evidence remains available without overwhelming the player overview.

The call record

Claims written down before the season, sealed at registration, and graded in public — misses kept.

No pre-registered call was made on Jauan Jennings. The record holds 29 calls in total, selected from the board by signal strength and divergence — most players do not clear that bar, and silence here means we did not stake a claim on him, not that he graded badly.

2025 production

What he actually did last season. Measured, not projected.

Games

15

PPR pts

173.3

Half-PPR pts

118.3

PPR / game

11.6

Receiving

Targets

90

Receptions

55

Rec yards

643

Rec TDs

9

Target share

16.4%

Air yards share

21.1%

WOPR

0.39

Rushing

Carries

0

Rush yards

0

Rush TDs

0

Yards / carry

Passing

Pass yards

0

Pass TDs

0

Interceptions

0

nflverse season totals for 2025, joined on normalised name and position (gsis 00-0036259). These are actuals — nothing here is modelled.

What the market says

Every ADP source we hold, side by side, and where our model sits against them.

Consensus ADP

163.0

Median

160.0

Sources ranking him

3/4

Agreement

Medium

SourceRank / ADP
Yahoo ADP160.0
Sleeper ADP158.0
RTSports ADP171.0
Fantasy Football Calculator ADP (live)unranked

The sources that ranked him disagree by 13.0 picks between highest and lowest (standard deviation 5.7).

Mean and median are computed across the sources that actually ranked him — an unranked source never enters the average, because a sentinel treated as a pick number would drag a real player hundreds of slots. Spread, deviation and agreement are null under two ranked sources rather than 0, since one source cannot agree with itself. The FFT model rank is our own output and is never folded in as if it were an outside source.

Week-to-week, 2025

Consistency and range — the part a season total hides.

Weeks with a line

15

PPR / game

11.6

Std dev

5.5

Coeff. of variation

0.48

Boom rate

0% (0/15)

Bust rate

33% (5/15)

Best week

19.9 wk 2

Worst week

1.7 wk 6

Recent form — last 4 games with a line

14.1 PPR per game over weeks 15, 16, 17, 18+2.6 against his season average.

Every week (15 lines)
WkOppPPRTgtRecYdsCarRuYdTDRZ
1SEA3.652160002
2NO19.9105890010
4JAX6.442240002
6TB1.73170000
7ATL7.174310000
8HOU8.574450001
9NYG14.154410013
10LA17.196710011
11ARI9.464540001
12CAR15.175410011
13CLE13.964390011
15TEN18.753370024
16IND18.165710012
17CHI12.242420011
18SEA7.564350000

The weekly LINES are measured: 2025 game logs, joined on gsis id 00-0036259. Everything derived from them above — per-game, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, boom and bust rates, recent form — is computed by us and carries the FFT model (beta) label. It is not an observed stat.

This whole block is on the PPR scale, including the thresholds — the artifact publishes boom and bust in PPR (WR: boom ≥ 20, bust ≤ 8) and converting only the points would leave the rates measured against a different ruler than the one they were defined on. The hero above is half-PPR because that is what the model ranks on. Two rulers, each labelled, rather than one silently mixed. Rates need at least 4 games to carry weight; recent form is the last 4.

Advanced usage & efficiency

Route concepts, red-zone opportunity, and separation-adjusted catch rate.

Red-zone opportunity

Scoring upside

RZ targets

23

RZ carries

RZ TDs

7

aDOT

10.2

Concept EPA / target

-0.011

Classified targets

98

Catch residual

-3.485

YAC over expected

0.77

Most-run concept: QUICK_OUT on 28.6% of his classified targets.

Every field is derived by FFT from openly-licensed nflverse play-by-play, or taken from the free public NFL Next Gen Stats endpoint. No licensed trial data (Sportradar, BALLDONTLIE) is included, which is why this file can be committed and shipped with the build. Red zone: Plays snapped inside the opponent 20-yard line. Red-zone usage measures opportunity; this repo’s own backtest shows it adds little on top of plain volume, so it is retained as context and is deliberately not described as an edge.

How the model gets there

The component projection behind the headline number, and what it was built from.

Projected games

11.9

Half-PPR (season)

77.0

PPR (season)

93.8

Confidence

low

Proj targets

52.9

Proj receptions

33.5

Proj rec yards

415

Proj rec TDs

3.0

Proj carries

0.8

Proj rush yards

4

Proj rush TDs

0.0

Proj pass yards

0

Proj pass TDs

0.0

Proj INTs

0.0

Touchdown regression

He actually scored 9 touchdowns last season. Against his measured opportunity the model expects a change of -5.9. The gap between what a player scored and what his opportunity implies is one of the four signals the edge engine reads.

What this projection was built from

15 g in 2025, 6 tgt/g, 82% snaps (regressed to the role, not the position), SWR5 on depth chart, age 29, new team MIN, -5.9 TD vs 2025 on red-zone opportunity

fft-projection-2.3.0-beta. The model reads measured production, opportunity and age, and reads no ADP field at any stage — so it can disagree with the market, which is the only reason a disagreement is worth anything. Draft capital was not resolved for this player, which the model treats as unknown rather than as undrafted.

What this page is standing on

Which sources answered for this player, and which did not.

  • Identity join: Resolved to gsis 00-0036259 via the 2025 nflverse season file. The weekly log and advanced splits are keyed on that id.
  • Market ADP: A bundled snapshot of platform ADP, not a live feed. Shown for comparison and never read by the projection model.
  • Headshot: Resolved from exact-name.
  • Vitals: Height, weight, college and jersey are read from nflverse and keyed on gsis id 00-0036259 — not on name. Name keying matches players to relatives who share one: "Marvin Harrison Jr." also matches his father's 1996 row, and whichever came first in the file would win.
  • Not shown: draft round and pick. The bundled player file carries them on roughly 48% of rows and populates them late, so a blank is equally consistent with a genuine undrafted free agent and with a first-rounder nobody has ingested yet. The model’s own three-state read is used instead, above.

Model run caveats

  • No usable red-zone RECEIVING fit for QB — receiving touchdowns at that position come from the shrunk per-target rate alone.
  • Rookie draft capital on this run: 82 drafted (projected from round/pick), 141 confirmed undrafted, 177 with capital UNKNOWN.
  • 177 of 400 rookie projections (44%) have NO KNOWN DRAFT CAPITAL because this draft class has not been ingested by any source the model can read. For those players the draft-capital path did not run: a first-round pick and a camp arm receive the same number, separated only by depth-chart order. Those projections are flagged `isPositionalFloor` and must be read as a floor for the role, not as a valuation of the player.

How the model works

Inputs, method, and the forbidden-inputs list. It reads no ADP at any stage.

Where it loses

Pre-registered calls, graded in public, misses kept on the page.

Model Rankings

Every player, with the model's BUY / FADE call against consensus ADP built into the board.