Live board
Today's Read
Scored 18 TDs on 63 red-zone opportunities — opportunity implies only about 13.75. Touchdown rates that far above expectation rarely repeat, and the market is paying for them.
Model rank
12.57
Market
1.6
Confidence
low
RB · DET · Bye 6
Elite Profile
Calibrated public rating
Projection
16.1
Half-PPR / game
Market ADP
1.6
Consensus overall
FFT fair value
4.3
Calibrated pick
Draft delta
-2.7
Market minus FFT
Draft recommendation
Market is aggressive
Risk / reliability
Low Risk
Reliability
89 / 99
Coverage
80%
Live board
Scored 18 TDs on 63 red-zone opportunities — opportunity implies only about 13.75. Touchdown rates that far above expectation rarely repeat, and the market is paying for them.
Model rank
12.57
Market
1.6
Confidence
low
2026 week 2
Our projection
21.4
Weighted weekly consensus
BDL projection
22.0
BALLDONTLIE weekly
Sleeper projection
24.2
Sleeper weekly
Game status
Not reported
No injury description reported
Latest practice
Not reported
Game-day active
Active
Started
Yes
Participation
Played
Game market
Total — · Spread —
Implied team total — · cross-book median
Live draft market
ADP 1.7 · Rostered 99.9%
BDL change -0.0%
BALLDONTLIE data checked 9/20/2026, 5:47:44 PM ET. Sportsbook values are consensus context, not betting advice.
Measured 2026 · Regular season
Loading 2026 results…
Actual BALLDONTLIE box scores · FFT-computed fantasy points · Preseason excluded. Missing stats are not zeroes.
2026 / Player Game Center
Jahmyr Gibbs · Recorded performance, game context, fantasy takeaways.
Loading game data…
Measured game log
Actual BALLDONTLIE box scores · FFT-computed fantasy points. Missing weeks are never filled with zeroes.
No 2026 regular-season stat line recorded for Jahmyr Gibbs yet.
This view will populate automatically when measured games enter the data spine.
FFT Newsroom
Position-relative
Opportunity / Workload
88
Elite
Top 2% at RB
Talent / Efficiency
74
Strong
Top 7% at RB
Offensive Environment
54
Watch
Top 51% at RB
OL / Run Environment
62
Average
Top 40% at RB
QB / Game-Script Fit
76
Strong
Top 22% at RB
Fantasy Playoff Schedule
55
Average
Top 37% at RB
Games
17
Half-PPR
289.9
Total TD
18
The measured inputs doing the most work inside this grade.
Value Over Replacement
+102.1
proj. half-PPR pts
Rank Delta
-3
position spots vs ADP
Value Grade
C
Slight Reach
Market
1.6
FFT value
4.3
Board Δ
-2.7
Week 15
@ MIN
Rank 24th
NeutralWeek 16
vs NYG
Rank 4th
EliteWeek 17
@ CHI
Rank 19th
NeutralEvery dot is a real position peer with a market price.
Deep research dossier
The decision dashboard ends above. Open only the research sections you need below—the full evidence remains available without overwhelming the player overview.
Claims written down before the season, sealed at registration, and graded in public — misses kept.
No pre-registered call was made on Jahmyr Gibbs. The record holds 29 calls in total, selected from the board by signal strength and divergence — most players do not clear that bar, and silence here means we did not stake a claim on him, not that he graded badly.
What he actually did last season. Measured, not projected.
Games
17
PPR pts
366.9
Half-PPR pts
289.9
PPR / game
21.6
Receiving
Targets
94
Receptions
77
Rec yards
616
Rec TDs
5
Target share
17.1%
Air yards share
1.4%
WOPR
0.27
Rushing
Carries
243
Rush yards
1223
Rush TDs
13
Yards / carry
5.03
Passing
Pass yards
0
Pass TDs
0
Interceptions
0
nflverse season totals for 2025, joined on normalised name and position (gsis 00-0039139). These are actuals — nothing here is modelled.
Every ADP source we hold, side by side, and where our model sits against them.
Consensus ADP
1.6
Median
1.7
Sources ranking him
4/4
Agreement
High
| Source | Rank / ADP |
|---|---|
| Yahoo ADP | 2.0 |
| Sleeper ADP | 2.0 |
| RTSports ADP | 1.0 |
| Fantasy Football Calculator ADP (live) | 1.4 |
The sources that ranked him disagree by 1.0 picks between highest and lowest (standard deviation 0.4).
Mean and median are computed across the sources that actually ranked him — an unranked source never enters the average, because a sentinel treated as a pick number would drag a real player hundreds of slots. Spread, deviation and agreement are null under two ranked sources rather than 0, since one source cannot agree with itself. The FFT model rank is our own output and is never folded in as if it were an outside source.
Consistency and range — the part a season total hides.
Weeks with a line
17
PPR / game
21.6
Std dev
13.1
Coeff. of variation
0.61
Boom rate
41% (7/17)
Bust rate
18% (3/17)
Best week
55.4 wk 12
Worst week
5.8 wk 9
Recent form — last 4 games with a line
14.8 PPR per game over weeks 15, 16, 17, 18 — -6.8 against his season average.
| Wk | Opp | PPR | Tgt | Rec | Yds | Car | RuYd | TD | RZ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GB | 15.0 | 10 | 10 | 31 | 9 | 19 | 0 | 4 |
| 2 | CHI | 19.4 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 12 | 94 | 1 | 5 |
| 3 | BAL | 26.9 | 6 | 5 | 32 | 22 | 67 | 2 | 11 |
| 4 | CLE | 17.7 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 15 | 91 | 1 | 4 |
| 5 | CIN | 16.7 | 2 | 2 | 33 | 12 | 54 | 1 | 6 |
| 6 | KC | 7.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 65 | 0 | 4 |
| 7 | TB | 36.8 | 3 | 3 | 82 | 17 | 136 | 2 | 1 |
| 9 | MIN | 5.8 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 25 | 0 | 2 |
| 10 | WAS | 38.2 | 4 | 3 | 30 | 15 | 142 | 3 | 5 |
| 11 | PHI | 19.6 | 8 | 5 | 107 | 12 | 39 | 0 | 3 |
| 12 | NYG | 55.4 | 12 | 11 | 45 | 15 | 219 | 3 | 1 |
| 13 | GB | 11.6 | 4 | 3 | 18 | 20 | 68 | 0 | 2 |
| 14 | DAL | 37.0 | 7 | 7 | 77 | 12 | 43 | 3 | 5 |
| 15 | LA | 9.8 | 7 | 4 | 20 | 13 | 38 | 0 | 3 |
| 16 | PIT | 22.8 | 13 | 10 | 66 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| 17 | MIN | 6.4 | 3 | 2 | 23 | 17 | 41 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | CHI | 20.3 | 5 | 3 | 33 | 19 | 80 | 1 | 3 |
The weekly LINES are measured: 2025 game logs, joined on gsis id 00-0039139. Everything derived from them above — per-game, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, boom and bust rates, recent form — is computed by us and carries the FFT model (beta) label. It is not an observed stat.
This whole block is on the PPR scale, including the thresholds — the artifact publishes boom and bust in PPR (RB: boom ≥ 20, bust ≤ 8) and converting only the points would leave the rates measured against a different ruler than the one they were defined on. The hero above is half-PPR because that is what the model ranks on. Two rulers, each labelled, rather than one silently mixed. Rates need at least 4 games to carry weight; recent form is the last 4.
Route concepts, red-zone opportunity, and separation-adjusted catch rate.
RZ targets
15
RZ carries
52
RZ TDs
14
aDOT
—
Concept EPA / target
0.189
Classified targets
94
Catch residual
—
YAC over expected
—
Most-run concept: SCREEN on 43.6% of his classified targets.
Every field is derived by FFT from openly-licensed nflverse play-by-play, or taken from the free public NFL Next Gen Stats endpoint. No licensed trial data (Sportradar, BALLDONTLIE) is included, which is why this file can be committed and shipped with the build. Red zone: Plays snapped inside the opponent 20-yard line. Red-zone usage measures opportunity; this repo’s own backtest shows it adds little on top of plain volume, so it is retained as context and is deliberately not described as an edge.
The component projection behind the headline number, and what it was built from.
Projected games
14.9
Half-PPR (season)
240.1
PPR (season)
266.0
Confidence
high
Proj targets
65.4
Proj receptions
51.8
Proj rec yards
428
Proj rec TDs
2.7
Proj carries
221.2
Proj rush yards
1011
Proj rush TDs
9.3
Proj pass yards
0
Proj pass TDs
0.0
Proj INTs
0.0
Touchdown regression
He actually scored 18 touchdowns last season. Against his measured opportunity the model expects a change of -6.0. The gap between what a player scored and what his opportunity implies is one of the four signals the edge engine reads.
What this projection was built from
17 g in 2025, 14.3 car/g, 5.5 tgt/g, 67% snaps (regressed to the role, not the position), RB1 on depth chart, age 24, -5.9 TD vs 2025 on red-zone opportunity
fft-projection-2.3.0-beta. The model reads measured production, opportunity and age, and reads no ADP field at any stage — so it can disagree with the market, which is the only reason a disagreement is worth anything. Draft capital was not resolved for this player, which the model treats as unknown rather than as undrafted.
Which sources answered for this player, and which did not.
Model run caveats
How the model works
Inputs, method, and the forbidden-inputs list. It reads no ADP at any stage.
Where it loses
Pre-registered calls, graded in public, misses kept on the page.
Model Rankings
Every player, with the model's BUY / FADE call against consensus ADP built into the board.