Skip to main content
Evan Engram headshot
Position: Tight endN Tier

Evan Engram

TE · DEN · Bye 10

Age 326'3"240 lbs9 yr
FFT9961

Elite Profile

Calibrated public rating

RAW 60 · 89% cov

Projection

5.6

Half-PPR / game

Market ADP

258.0

Consensus overall

FFT fair value

216.3

Calibrated pick

Draft delta

+41.7

Market minus FFT

Draft recommendation

Target ahead of market

Risk / reliability

Low Risk

84
Risk: Low

Reliability

84 / 99

Coverage

80%

Live board

Today's Read

NO MARKET DATA

Scored 1 TDs on 10 red-zone opportunities — opportunity implies about 3.59. Finishing that far below expectation tends to regress upward, and the market is still pricing the 1.

Model rank

Market

Confidence

medium

Full analysis

2026 week 2

Weekly Outlook

FFT · BDL · SLEEPER · MARKETS

Our projection

4.7

Weighted weekly consensus

BDL projection

5.4

BALLDONTLIE weekly

Sleeper projection

3.2

Sleeper weekly

Game status

Not reported

No injury description reported

Latest practice

Not reported

Game-day active

Active

Started

Pending

Participation

Pending

Game market

Total · Spread

Implied team total · cross-book median

Live draft market

ADP 169.0 · Rostered 6.7%

BDL change +0.1%

BALLDONTLIE data checked 9/20/2026, 6:37:43 PM ET. Sportsbook values are consensus context, not betting advice.

Measured 2026 · Regular season

Season Production

Loading 2026 results…

Actual BALLDONTLIE box scores · FFT-computed fantasy points · Preseason excluded. Missing stats are not zeroes.

2026 / Player Game Center

Every play has a story.

Evan Engram · Recorded performance, game context, fantasy takeaways.

Loading game data…

Measured game log

Weekly Performance

Actual BALLDONTLIE box scores · FFT-computed fantasy points. Missing weeks are never filled with zeroes.

No 2026 regular-season stat line recorded for Evan Engram yet.

This view will populate automatically when measured games enter the data spine.

FFT Newsroom

Latest news for Evan Engram

All reports

Position-relative

FFT99 Pillar Scores

Methodology

Target Command & Offensive Role

64

Average

64

Top 26% at TE

Replacement + Draft Economics

87

Elite

87

Top 12% at TE

TD / High-Value Opportunity

45

Watch

45

Top 58% at TE

Receiving Talent

64

Average

64

Top 25% at TE

Offensive Ecosystem

61

Average

61

Top 28% at TE

Fantasy Playoff Schedule

27

Watch

27

Top 92% at TE

Player Profile

Target Command & Offensive Role64
Replacement + Draft Economics87
TD / High-Value Opportunity45
Receiving Talent64
Offensive Ecosystem61
Fantasy Playoff Schedule27

Games

16

Half-PPR

52.8

Total TD

1

Model Component Contributions

The measured inputs doing the most work inside this grade.

Value Over Replacement
12%
Target Share
10%
Targets Per Game
8%
First-Read Share (proxy)
8%
Hierarchy
6%
Routes
6%
YPRR (Efficiency)
5%
RZ Target Share
4%

Draft Economics

Value Over Replacement

-28.4

proj. half-PPR pts

Rank Delta

+4

position spots vs ADP

Value Grade

B+

Good Value

reachfair valuesteal

Market

258.0

FFT value

216.3

Board Δ

+41.7

Playoff Schedule

Week 15

@ LV

Rank 30th

Tough

Week 16

vs BUF

Rank 32nd

Tough

Week 17

@ NE

Rank 13th

Great

FFT99 vs ADP

Every dot is a real position peer with a market price.

Evan EngramCONSENSUS ADP →FFT99 →

Deep research dossier

Evidence, history and model transparency

The decision dashboard ends above. Open only the research sections you need below—the full evidence remains available without overwhelming the player overview.

The call record

Claims written down before the season, sealed at registration, and graded in public — misses kept.

No pre-registered call was made on Evan Engram. The record holds 29 calls in total, selected from the board by signal strength and divergence — most players do not clear that bar, and silence here means we did not stake a claim on him, not that he graded badly.

2025 production

What he actually did last season. Measured, not projected.

Games

16

PPR pts

102.8

Half-PPR pts

52.8

PPR / game

6.4

Receiving

Targets

76

Receptions

50

Rec yards

461

Rec TDs

1

Target share

13.0%

Air yards share

7.4%

WOPR

0.25

Rushing

Carries

1

Rush yards

7

Rush TDs

0

Yards / carry

7.00

Passing

Pass yards

0

Pass TDs

0

Interceptions

0

nflverse season totals for 2025, joined on normalised name and position (gsis 00-0033881). These are actuals — nothing here is modelled.

What the market says

Every ADP source we hold, side by side, and where our model sits against them.

Consensus ADP

258.0

Median

258.0

Sources ranking him

1/4

Agreement

SourceRank / ADP
Yahoo ADPunranked
Sleeper ADPunranked
RTSports ADP258.0
Fantasy Football Calculator ADP (live)unranked

Mean and median are computed across the sources that actually ranked him — an unranked source never enters the average, because a sentinel treated as a pick number would drag a real player hundreds of slots. Spread, deviation and agreement are null under two ranked sources rather than 0, since one source cannot agree with itself. The FFT model rank is our own output and is never folded in as if it were an outside source.

Week-to-week, 2025

Consistency and range — the part a season total hides.

Weeks with a line

16

PPR / game

6.4

Std dev

3.8

Coeff. of variation

0.59

Boom rate

0% (0/16)

Bust rate

31% (5/16)

Best week

13.9 wk 13

Worst week

0.0 wk 9

Recent form — last 4 games with a line

5.3 PPR per game over weeks 15, 16, 17, 18-1.1 against his season average.

Every week (16 lines)
WkOppPPRTgtRecYdsCarRuYdTDRZ
1TEN5.143210000
2IND2.221120000
4CIN6.974290002
5PHI13.364330011
6NYJ9.965421700
7NYG9.285420000
8DAL7.644360001
9HOU0.03000000
10LV3.252120001
11KC7.354330001
13WAS13.996790002
14LV2.82280000
15GB2.231120000
16JAX5.642360000
17KC6.144210002
18LAC7.543450000

The weekly LINES are measured: 2025 game logs, joined on gsis id 00-0033881. Everything derived from them above — per-game, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, boom and bust rates, recent form — is computed by us and carries the FFT model (beta) label. It is not an observed stat.

This whole block is on the PPR scale, including the thresholds — the artifact publishes boom and bust in PPR (TE: boom ≥ 15, bust ≤ 5) and converting only the points would leave the rates measured against a different ruler than the one they were defined on. The hero above is half-PPR because that is what the model ranks on. Two rulers, each labelled, rather than one silently mixed. Rates need at least 4 games to carry weight; recent form is the last 4.

Advanced usage & efficiency

Route concepts, red-zone opportunity, and separation-adjusted catch rate.

Red-zone opportunity

Scoring upside

RZ targets

12

RZ carries

RZ TDs

1

aDOT

4.3

Concept EPA / target

-0.022

Classified targets

82

Catch residual

-8.493

YAC over expected

-0.00

Most-run concept: FLAT on 41.5% of his classified targets.

Every field is derived by FFT from openly-licensed nflverse play-by-play, or taken from the free public NFL Next Gen Stats endpoint. No licensed trial data (Sportradar, BALLDONTLIE) is included, which is why this file can be committed and shipped with the build. Red zone: Plays snapped inside the opponent 20-yard line. Red-zone usage measures opportunity; this repo’s own backtest shows it adds little on top of plain volume, so it is retained as context and is deliberately not described as an edge.

How the model gets there

The component projection behind the headline number, and what it was built from.

Projected games

13.6

Half-PPR (season)

75.9

PPR (season)

95.6

Confidence

high

Proj targets

56.3

Proj receptions

39.5

Proj rec yards

378

Proj rec TDs

3.0

Proj carries

1.0

Proj rush yards

2

Proj rush TDs

0.1

Proj pass yards

0

Proj pass TDs

0.0

Proj INTs

0.0

Touchdown regression

He actually scored 1 touchdowns last season. Against his measured opportunity the model expects a change of 2.0. The gap between what a player scored and what his opportunity implies is one of the four signals the edge engine reads.

What this projection was built from

16 g in 2025, 4.8 tgt/g, 42% snaps (regressed to the role, not the position), TE1 on depth chart, age 32, +2 TD vs 2025 on red-zone opportunity

fft-projection-2.3.0-beta. The model reads measured production, opportunity and age, and reads no ADP field at any stage — so it can disagree with the market, which is the only reason a disagreement is worth anything. Draft capital was not resolved for this player, which the model treats as unknown rather than as undrafted.

What this page is standing on

Which sources answered for this player, and which did not.

  • Identity join: Resolved to gsis 00-0033881 via the 2025 nflverse season file. The weekly log and advanced splits are keyed on that id.
  • Market ADP: A bundled snapshot of platform ADP, not a live feed. Shown for comparison and never read by the projection model.
  • Headshot: Resolved from exact-name.
  • Vitals: Height, weight, college and jersey are read from nflverse and keyed on gsis id 00-0033881 — not on name. Name keying matches players to relatives who share one: "Marvin Harrison Jr." also matches his father's 1996 row, and whichever came first in the file would win.
  • Not shown: draft round and pick. The bundled player file carries them on roughly 48% of rows and populates them late, so a blank is equally consistent with a genuine undrafted free agent and with a first-rounder nobody has ingested yet. The model’s own three-state read is used instead, above.

Model run caveats

  • No usable red-zone RECEIVING fit for QB — receiving touchdowns at that position come from the shrunk per-target rate alone.
  • Rookie draft capital on this run: 82 drafted (projected from round/pick), 141 confirmed undrafted, 177 with capital UNKNOWN.
  • 177 of 400 rookie projections (44%) have NO KNOWN DRAFT CAPITAL because this draft class has not been ingested by any source the model can read. For those players the draft-capital path did not run: a first-round pick and a camp arm receive the same number, separated only by depth-chart order. Those projections are flagged `isPositionalFloor` and must be read as a floor for the role, not as a valuation of the player.

How the model works

Inputs, method, and the forbidden-inputs list. It reads no ADP at any stage.

Where it loses

Pre-registered calls, graded in public, misses kept on the page.

Model Rankings

Every player, with the model's BUY / FADE call against consensus ADP built into the board.