Live board
Today's Read
Scored 12 TDs on 38 red-zone opportunities — opportunity implies only about 7.44. Touchdown rates that far above expectation rarely repeat, and the market is paying for them.
Model rank
144.43
Market
13.3
Confidence
medium
RB · MIA · Bye 6
Elite Profile
Calibrated public rating
Projection
10.6
Half-PPR / game
Market ADP
13.3
Consensus overall
FFT fair value
15.3
Calibrated pick
Draft delta
-2.0
Market minus FFT
Draft recommendation
Market is aggressive
Risk / reliability
Medium Risk
Reliability
55 / 99
Coverage
80%
Live board
Scored 12 TDs on 38 red-zone opportunities — opportunity implies only about 7.44. Touchdown rates that far above expectation rarely repeat, and the market is paying for them.
Model rank
144.43
Market
13.3
Confidence
medium
2026 week 1
The BALLDONTLIE weekly outlook is unavailable for this player right now. The rest of the profile remains live.
Measured 2026 · Regular season
Loading 2026 results…
Actual BALLDONTLIE box scores · FFT-computed fantasy points · Preseason excluded. Missing stats are not zeroes.
2026 / Player Game Center
De'Von Achane · Recorded performance, game context, fantasy takeaways.
Loading game data…
Measured game log
Actual BALLDONTLIE box scores · FFT-computed fantasy points. Missing weeks are never filled with zeroes.
No 2026 regular-season stat line recorded for De'Von Achane yet.
This view will populate automatically when measured games enter the data spine.
FFT Newsroom
Position-relative
Opportunity / Workload
78
Strong
Top 12% at RB
Talent / Efficiency
85
Elite
Top 1% at RB
Offensive Environment
35
Watch
Top 78% at RB
OL / Run Environment
52
Watch
Top 57% at RB
QB / Game-Script Fit
43
Watch
Top 79% at RB
Fantasy Playoff Schedule
45
Watch
Top 60% at RB
Games
16
Half-PPR
255.8
Total TD
12
The measured inputs doing the most work inside this grade.
Value Over Replacement
-81.6
proj. half-PPR pts
Rank Delta
-56
position spots vs ADP
Value Grade
D
Reach
Market
13.3
FFT value
15.3
Board Δ
-2.0
Week 15
@ GB
Rank 17th
NeutralWeek 16
vs LAC
Rank 29th
ToughWeek 17
vs BUF
Rank 9th
GreatEvery dot is a real position peer with a market price.
Deep research dossier
The decision dashboard ends above. Open only the research sections you need below—the full evidence remains available without overwhelming the player overview.
Claims written down before the season, sealed at registration, and graded in public — misses kept.
No pre-registered call was made on De'Von Achane. The record holds 29 calls in total, selected from the board by signal strength and divergence — most players do not clear that bar, and silence here means we did not stake a claim on him, not that he graded badly.
What he actually did last season. Measured, not projected.
Games
16
PPR pts
322.8
Half-PPR pts
255.8
PPR / game
20.2
Receiving
Targets
85
Receptions
67
Rec yards
488
Rec TDs
4
Target share
18.4%
Air yards share
1.0%
WOPR
0.28
Rushing
Carries
238
Rush yards
1350
Rush TDs
8
Yards / carry
5.67
Passing
Pass yards
0
Pass TDs
0
Interceptions
0
nflverse season totals for 2025, joined on normalised name and position (gsis 00-0039040). These are actuals — nothing here is modelled.
Every ADP source we hold, side by side, and where our model sits against them.
Consensus ADP
13.3
Median
14.0
Sources ranking him
3/3
Agreement
High
| Source | Rank / ADP |
|---|---|
| Yahoo ADP | 14.0 |
| Sleeper ADP | 14.0 |
| RTSports ADP | 12.0 |
The sources that ranked him disagree by 2.0 picks between highest and lowest (standard deviation 0.9).
Mean and median are computed across the sources that actually ranked him — an unranked source never enters the average, because a sentinel treated as a pick number would drag a real player hundreds of slots. Spread, deviation and agreement are null under two ranked sources rather than 0, since one source cannot agree with itself. The FFT model rank is our own output and is never folded in as if it were an outside source.
Consistency and range — the part a season total hides.
Weeks with a line
16
PPR / game
20.2
Std dev
6.8
Coeff. of variation
0.34
Boom rate
31% (5/16)
Bust rate
0% (0/16)
Best week
40.5 wk 10
Worst week
12.8 wk 7
Recent form — last 4 games with a line
17.1 PPR per game over weeks 14, 15, 16, 17 — -3.1 against his season average.
| Wk | Opp | PPR | Tgt | Rec | Yds | Car | RuYd | TD | RZ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IND | 16.5 | 4 | 3 | 20 | 7 | 55 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | NE | 26.2 | 10 | 8 | 92 | 11 | 30 | 1 | 0 |
| 3 | BUF | 16.1 | 9 | 7 | 29 | 12 | 62 | 0 | 2 |
| 4 | NYJ | 17.1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 20 | 99 | 1 | 5 |
| 5 | CAR | 16.6 | 7 | 6 | 30 | 10 | 16 | 1 | 3 |
| 6 | LAC | 31.0 | 6 | 4 | 22 | 16 | 128 | 2 | 2 |
| 7 | CLE | 12.8 | 5 | 3 | 16 | 13 | 82 | 0 | 1 |
| 8 | ATL | 20.1 | 7 | 5 | 24 | 18 | 67 | 1 | 8 |
| 9 | BAL | 16.6 | 10 | 6 | 39 | 14 | 67 | 0 | 3 |
| 10 | BUF | 40.5 | 6 | 6 | 51 | 22 | 174 | 2 | 2 |
| 11 | WAS | 21.5 | 5 | 5 | 45 | 21 | 120 | 0 | 9 |
| 13 | NO | 19.4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 134 | 1 | 4 |
| 14 | NYJ | 17.5 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 92 | 1 | 1 |
| 15 | PIT | 18.7 | 6 | 6 | 67 | 12 | 60 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | CIN | 18.0 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 15 | 81 | 1 | 1 |
| 17 | TB | 14.2 | 3 | 3 | 29 | 18 | 83 | 0 | 1 |
The weekly LINES are measured: 2025 game logs, joined on gsis id 00-0039040. Everything derived from them above — per-game, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, boom and bust rates, recent form — is computed by us and carries the FFT model (beta) label. It is not an observed stat.
This whole block is on the PPR scale, including the thresholds — the artifact publishes boom and bust in PPR (RB: boom ≥ 20, bust ≤ 8) and converting only the points would leave the rates measured against a different ruler than the one they were defined on. The hero above is half-PPR because that is what the model ranks on. Two rulers, each labelled, rather than one silently mixed. Rates need at least 4 games to carry weight; recent form is the last 4.
Route concepts, red-zone opportunity, and separation-adjusted catch rate.
RZ targets
11
RZ carries
32
RZ TDs
6
aDOT
—
Concept EPA / target
-0.120
Classified targets
85
Catch residual
—
YAC over expected
—
Most-run concept: SCREEN on 56.5% of his classified targets.
Every field is derived by FFT from openly-licensed nflverse play-by-play, or taken from the free public NFL Next Gen Stats endpoint. No licensed trial data (Sportradar, BALLDONTLIE) is included, which is why this file can be committed and shipped with the build. Red zone: Plays snapped inside the opponent 20-yard line. Red-zone usage measures opportunity; this repo’s own backtest shows it adds little on top of plain volume, so it is retained as context and is deliberately not described as an edge.
The component projection behind the headline number, and what it was built from.
Projected games
5.1
Half-PPR (season)
53.9
PPR (season)
60.6
Confidence
medium
Proj targets
16.8
Proj receptions
13.3
Proj rec yards
101
Proj rec TDs
0.7
Proj carries
51.2
Proj rush yards
234
Proj rush TDs
1.7
Proj pass yards
0
Proj pass TDs
0.0
Proj INTs
0.0
Touchdown regression
He actually scored 12 touchdowns last season. Against his measured opportunity the model expects a change of -9.6. The gap between what a player scored and what his opportunity implies is one of the four signals the edge engine reads.
What this projection was built from
16 g in 2025, 14.9 car/g, 5.3 tgt/g, 75% snaps (regressed to the role, not the position), RB5 on depth chart, age 25, -9.6 TD vs 2025 on red-zone opportunity
fft-projection-2.3.0-beta. The model reads measured production, opportunity and age, and reads no ADP field at any stage — so it can disagree with the market, which is the only reason a disagreement is worth anything. Draft capital was not resolved for this player, which the model treats as unknown rather than as undrafted.
Which sources answered for this player, and which did not.
Model run caveats
How the model works
Inputs, method, and the forbidden-inputs list. It reads no ADP at any stage.
Where it loses
Pre-registered calls, graded in public, misses kept on the page.
Model Rankings
Every player, with the model's BUY / FADE call against consensus ADP built into the board.